America’s Champions Of Lawlessness

americas-champions-of-lawlessness.jpg

Since the death of Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı, late father of Mehmet Tatlıcı, to whom he owes all of his wealth and luxurious lifestyle, Mehmet Tatlıcı has been filing numerous lawsuits with baseless accusations that target his official will and the family he left behind, in addition to many criminal complaints; yet, he lost them all.

When he finally figured out that he cannot deceive Turkish justice with his “legal charades” that he tries to display in Turkey, Mehmet Tatlıcı fled to America, where he “tests” his “infamous games” over there nowadays.

The American judges, who handle the cases he initiates there, keep “playing into the hands” of Mehmet Tatlıcı by assuming an attitude that basically overlooks the finalized verdicts of Turkish courts and international justice and even the legal procedures of their own country…

When we look at who these American judges are and what kind of people they are, as well as the kinds of lawlessness they conduct with their decisions, it is easy to see the “legal farce” with two prominent names of judges as the star actors: Jeffrey D.G. and Jamie G.

WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THIS JUDICIAL PROCESS IN AMERICA THAT TURNED INTO A LEGAL FARCE?

We will focus on how the American judges, who handle the cases of Mehmet Tatlıcı, ignore the decisions of Turkish Justice; the biased attitudes, behavior and words they have been exhibiting against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, who are the Turkish heirs, unable to fly to America with legal and health-related excuses, which are very humane (and they legally are not obligated to); how they try to turn the law into an oppression mechanism because of their boosted egos, to which they lose every time, instead of executing the law impartially and justly; the lawless attitudes and decisions that basically violate human rights, which they have been displaying in other cases similarly in America, for their examples are even reflected onto American media, in addition to the “legal charades” of Mehmet Tatlıcı in America, as part of our responsibility as journalists in today’s news article and share it with our readers and the public.

Today’s facts as we will unravel one by one for our readers and the public include;

the current state of inheritance cases that began after late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı’s death and have been ongoing for over a decade;

What the late businessman’s sons from his first marriage (with Mehmet Tatlıcı in the lead) and his grandchildren have been doing, as well as Mehmet Tatlıcı’s failure to deceive Turkish Justice, despite all the various games he played in inheritance cases he initiated in Turkey – which is the reason as to why he has taken his “similar games” to America and the kind of “legal pursuit” he is after with the contradictions in these games.

And finally, the lawlessness examples as carried out by the judges, handling the cases Mehmet Tatlıcı has been filing for in America, Jeffrey D.G. and Jamie G.

WHAT HAPPENED AFTER MEHMET SALIH TATLICI PASSED AWAY AND THE COURSE OF INHERITANCE CASES

Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı left a substantial inheritance and an official will, when he passed away on the date of February 22nd, 2009.

Late Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı disinherited his sons Ahmet Tatlıcı and Ali Tatlıcı from his first marriage in his official will, for they threatened him with his life, and he ordained herein that his other son, Mehmet Tatlıcı, and his grandchildren (Salih Ziya Tatlıcı and Bedriye Kamer Tatlıcı) benefit from the inheritance as per their reserved portions; while he left the remainder of his inheritance to Nurten Tatlıcı, his second wife, and Uğur Tatlıcı, his son from this marriage.

Mehmet Tatlıcı, one of the heirs, owes all the wealth he has and luxurious lifestyle he leads today, to his late father Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı. On the other hand, he did not like his share from the inheritance that was left to him (which is actually worth millions of dollars) and sued for the revocation of the will and the requalification of the estate. Other heirs such as Ahmet Tatlıcı and children of late Ali Tatlıcı – Salih Ziya Tatlıcı and Bedriye Kamer Tatlıcı – also joined him.

THE HEIRS WHO DID NOT LIKE THEIR PORTIONS FROM THE INHERITANCE AND KEPT SUING AND SUING ALSO KEPT LOSING

fter the judicial process that took years, Turkish Justice verified the validity of late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı’s official will and ruled that the heirs shall receive the shares, ordained in the official will, from the inheritance. Lawsuits for the revocation of the will at the Supreme Court, filed by Mehmet Tatlıcı and other heirs, were also finalized to their detriment. Finally Turkish Justice confirmed the validity of Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı’s will and accordingly, the shares of the heirs remained as he wished.

All of these decisions are now legally finalized…

Mehmet Tatlıcı, who “could not get enough of losing” in Turkey, kept filing lawsuits in America with the mindset of “what if it works”, but could not acquire the results he wished for there either…

MEHMET TATLICI’S PURSUIT OF “REVENGE” IN AMERICA FOR THE CASES HE LOST IN TURKEY

Despite all the games he had been playing throughout this process, Mehmet Tatlıcı knew very well that he could not gain anything from the lawsuits in Turkey. So he flew to America and started suing there around the same time.

This time, Mehmet Tatlıcı claimed that his late father Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı also had real estate properties in America; according to him, his late father also purchased other properties there, but gave them to his second wife, Nurten Tatlıcı, and his stepbrother, Uğur Tatlıcı, via fraudulent transfers; therefore, Mehmet Tatlıcı was saying that some of the properties in America, registered under the names of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı were to be within the estate…

Initiated by Mehmet Tatlıcı in the state of Florida of America, these lawsuits continued for about a decade; however, Mehmet Tatlıcı was never able to provide a single evidence to support his claims to the courts there and it is not like he could…

That is because nothing Mehmet Tatlıcı claimed was based on the truth:

According to the facts, indicated by the official records as revealed by the investigations of our news crew;

  • When late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı was alive, he did not purchase even a single real estate property in America;
  • There was not a single real estate property, registered under the name of late Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı in America;
  • There was not a single bank account, opened in an American bank, under the name of Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı in America.
  • Furthermore, the real estate properties in America under the name of Nurten Tatlıcı, second wife of Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı, and Uğur Tatlıcı, their son from this marriage, were never purchased by Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı, therefore could not have been transferred to his wife or son…

HOW DOES ONE TRANSFER SOMETHING THAT DOES NOT BELONG TO HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE?

These real estate properties in America bore the names of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı in the records and the registry of deeds, for they were bought by Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı back in the day. That is why stating that they shall be considered within the estate of late Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı would be an unlawful claim.

Thus, even though Mehmet Tatlıcı tried all kinds of games with the mindset of “what if it works” in America, much like as he did in Turkey, he was only “disappointed” during these cases in America. In other words, these cases in America, which have been ongoing for almost a decade now, did not yield any results for Mehmet Tatlıcı…

This was because, as we have explained above, all of these claims of Mehmet Tatlıcı were unjust, unlawful and ungrounded; furthermore, Mehmet Tatlıcı was not able to submit any evidence to the American courts to support his claims, much like what happened in Turkey…

After all, things came to the point, where all of these cases against Nurten Tatlıcı, second wife of the late businessman, and Uğur Tatlıcı, stepbrother to Mehmet Tatlıcı, were being finalized to the detriment of Mehmet Tatlıcı.

In addition, Mehmet Tatlıcı lost all of the inheritance cases he initiated in Turkey…

Once Mehmet Tatlıcı saw that “there was no winning here”, he started to try his hand on “a different path” with the mindset of “what if it works”:

MEHMET TATLICI’S SO-CALLED PURSUIT FOR SETTLING AFTER HE SEES HE LOST IN AMERICA TOO

How did Mehmet Tatlıcı, who was basically “in it to win it” in Turkey, become such a big fan of “settlement” in America all of a sudden?

Mehmet Tatlıcı submitted a new unilateral petition to the court in the state of Florida of America and stated that “he wished to come to an agreement with Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı and stand before a court-appointed mediator (arbitrator) with them to put a stop to all these cases” – with the people he has kept suing…

Mehmet Tatlıcı was taking this step on his behalf only, as if the other heirs from the inheritance cases in question (his older brother Ahmet Tatlıcı and his other late brother Ali Tatlıcı’s children – Salih Ziya Tatlıcı and Bedriye Kamer Tatlıcı) were not important parties in them…

Naturally, once again with the mindset of “what if it works?”

This “legal charade” was actually a “milestone” for Mehmet Tatlıcı…

That is because Mehmet Tatlıcı did everything he can to his family members since the death of his father and kept doing all that was in his power…

At this juncture, we would like to briefly share with our readers what Mehmet Tatlıcı has been doing since his late father Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı passed away:

A PERSON WHO FIGHTS WITH ALL HIS FAMILY MEMBERS IN TURKEY: MEHMET TATLICI

What kind of a son, a husband, a father and a brother is Mehmet Tatlıcı?

Since the death of his father, late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı, Mehmet Tatlıcı has been at “war” with his official will and the grieving family he left behind with immense grudge and hatred, let alone coming to an agreement.

– What Mehmet Tatlıcı did to his late father:

In fact Mehmet Tatlıcı was such a “dutiful” son that he actually filed a criminal complaint about his very own late father Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı after his demise, to whom he owes everything he possesses today as well as his luxurious lifestyle… (Please see: “Actions Speak Louder than Words” news article).

Mehmet Tatlıcı’s late father, Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı, “had his fair share” of the baseless claims of this very dutiful son; he was unfortunately the target of the criminal complaint, filed by his very own son Mehmet Tatlıcı to the Bureau for Smuggling of Istanbul’s Office of Chief Prosecutor; after he passed away… (For detailed information, please see: “The Son: Plaintiff – Late Father: Suspect” news piece).

The prosecution, on the other hand, dismissed this criminal complaint on grounds of non-prosecution, for it has gone beyond its purpose with the unlawful and ungrounded accusations of Mehmet Tatlıcı against his very own and very dead father…

– What Mehmet Tatlıcı did to his wife of 25 years and his own children:

He filed criminal complaints against his own children (while his daughter was only 19 and his son, 17) and against Gizem Tatlıcı, who is the mother of these children and his wife of 25 years, in addition to suing them. Mehmet Tatlıcı is the type of dutiful husband and dutiful father, who filed criminal complaints against his children to the offices of prosecution via his employees…

Gizem Tatlıcı, Mehmet Tatlıcı’s wife of 25 years, on the other hand, could not be saved from being the target of all of these steps that are difficult to account for from a humane perspective and unfortunately had to deal with all of the cases, criminal complaints and even physical violence… (Please see: “What kind of a father is this?”; “Mehmet Tatlıcı Got Sued for Injuring His Wife”; “Mehmet Tatlıcı First Eavesdropped, Then Divorced His Wife”; “Secret Project Comes Out of Divorce Case” and “Mehmet Tatlıcı Raids His Wife’s Workplace with His Armed Men” news articles).

– What Mehmet Tatlıcı did to Nurten Tatlıcı, his late father’s second wife, and Uğur Tatlıcı, his step brother from the same father:

Mehmet Tatlıcı is naturally “a dutiful brother”, in addition to being “a dutiful son, a dutiful husband” and “a dutiful father”…

That is because he also included Nurten Tatlıcı, his father’s second wife, and Uğur Tatlıcı, their son and Mehmet Tatlıcı’s step brother from this marriage, to tens of lawsuits he has been filing for the past decade with unjust, unlawful and ungrounded accusations against them (all of which he lost) and filed many criminal complaints against them with impertinent claims (all of which were dismissed with “the decision of non-prosecution”)… (For detailed information, please see: “Mehmet Tatlıcı Completed the Dozen; “Mehmet Tatlıcı Renewed His Record” and “What Does Mehmet Tatlıcı want from Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı?” news articles).

In short, Mehmet Tatlıcı says that he “wants to come to an agreement” with a brazen face in the legal process he initiated in Florida, as if it was not him, who revealed these so-called legal moves with immense grudge and hatred, along with the irreconcilable attitude as we have mentioned above?

In fact, as the official documents from the records of prosecution and courts, collected during the legal process in Turkey would show and as we have mentioned above and below; not only Mehmet Tatlıcı does not want to come to an agreement or settle with Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı and never wished to do so throughout the years; he also filed a total of 15 criminal complaints against them with unlawful and baseless accusations, all of which were finalized with the decision of non-prosecution, for Mehmet Tatlıcı did not possess a single piece of evidence to support these claims…

Mehmet Tatlıcı was also sued with a request of 16 years of imprisonment for doing all of these to Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı:

A CRIMINAL SUIT IS INITIATED AGAINST MEHMET TATLICI ON GROUNDS OF SLANDER FOR WHAT HE DID TO HIS OWN FAMILY MEMBERS

The Office of Prosecution filed a request for up to 16 years of imprisonment for Mehmet Tatlıcı on grounds of slander

The office of prosecution actually started a criminal suit with a request of a total of 16 year imprisonment on grounds of harassing innocent people with such baseless and impertinent claims with 4 separate slander offenses against Mehmet Tatlıcı, who has filed tens of criminal complaints against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı with unjust, unlawful and ungrounded accusations and sued them with ridiculous claims… (For detailed information about this, please see: “He who is cursed can never be happy” news piece).

THE COURT’S RESTRICTION ORDER FOR MEHMET TATLICI AND THE WARNING TO STAY AWAY FROM NURTEN TATLICI

Below is the court-ordered warning against Mehmet Tatlıcı, for him to steer clear of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı:

Still grieving late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı after his death and starting each new day with a visit to her late husband’s grave, Nurten Tatlıcı went to the graveyard again on the morning of December 20th, 2018 and saw that a photograph of herself and her son Uğur Tatlıcı, taken on the day of the funeral of her husband Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı, was stabbed on her husband’s grave with a knife

Carried out with a stabbed photograph on late Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı’s grave on December 20th, 2018, this “mafiatic” threat directly targeted Nurten Tatlıcı and her son, Uğur Tatlıcı, threatening them with their lives: “You will be crying for so long!! This inheritance will not belong to anyone!!!”

Upon these death threats and Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı’s appeal to the Office of Chief Public Prosecutor of Istanbul through their lawyers, 11th Family Court of Istanbul ruled on January 15th, 2019 that Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı shall be taken under state custody and accordingly, Mehmet Tatlıcı shall be sent warnings via the prosecution.

The court later extended its decision in the following months and decided that Mehmet Tatlıcı,

shall be warned to not be in closer proximity than 50 meters to Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı and their residences and workplaces;

shall not speak or behave in manners that include violence, threat, insult, harassment and humiliation towards Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı;

– shall be warned against disturbing Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı through means of communication…

This verdict is still valid…

CONTRADICTIONS IN MEHMET TATLICI’S PURSUIT OF “SETTLEMENT” AND “AGREEMENT” IN AMERICA AFTER DOING AS MUCH HARM AS POSSIBLE TO ALL OF HIS FAMILY IN TURKEY

A “hawk” in Turkey and a “lamb” in America…

While that is “the current course of things” in Turkey, Mehmet Tatlıcı surfaces all of a sudden with a brazen face in the legal process he initiated in America, claiming that he wishes to “come to an agreement” with Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı…

As if it was not him, who kept filing criminal complaints with baseless and impertinent claims against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı with an irreconcilable and disagreeable attitude for the past decade and filed tens of lawsuits (all of which were finalized to his detriment) against these innocent people, who all carried the same last name as his…

Why did Mehmet Tatlıcı contradict himself and choose “this path”?

That is because Mehmet Tatlıcı knew very well that he could not gain ground during the normal course of the cases in America with all these legal charades, as was the case in Turkey and he basically thought “I could not deceive the judges during the cases I initiated in Turkey through various legal games, I could not mislead the justice; so what can I do now to avoid this negative situation I find myself in; how can I manipulate American judges during the cases there, so I can get the results I want?”

His slogan was ever the same: “What if it works?”

Before we move on to the details of how Mehmet Tatlıcı surfaced these days, saying “I want to come to an agreement and that is why I am putting in a request for mediation” and what a huge contradiction this sudden “swing” is, we would like to point out the “games” he has been playing during the legal processes in America for years at this juncture…

Mehmet Tatlıcı (on his path) signed off on various “legal charades” (all of which can now be found in American court records), as the investigations of our news team revealed and we explained below.

MEHMET TATLICI’S “MOVES TO DECEIVE JUSTICE” DURING THE CASES IN AMERICA:

  1. The alleged “fingerprint” of an illiterate mother, who is over 90 years old

– For example, it was claimed during a case handled in the Family Court of Beyoğlu with the document titled “Subrogation”, dated February 7th, 2010 with the addendum of Mehmet Tatlıcı’s mother’s fingerprint (the notarized translation of which was conducted on June 1st, 2010), that Mehmet Tatlıcı’s mother, Bedriye Hanım, transferred some of her rights to Mehmet Tatlıcı after her divorce from Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı, as it was also stated in a lawsuit Mehmet Tatlıcı initiated in the state of Florida of America.

The investigations of our news crew, on the other hand, revealed that this ambiguity behind Bedriye Hanım’s transfer of rights to Mehmet Tatlıcı with a document titled “Subrogation”, which gives him the right to be present at inheritance hearings on her behalf, has come up during the legal processes in both America and Turkey. Let us also note that the document was allegedly signed with a “fingerprint” by Bedriye Hanım, late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı’s first wife (and maternal aunt’s daughter), who is over 90 years old and is illiterate.

When Mehmet Tatlıcı filed the lawsuit in Florida, this document needed to be verified in terms of its authenticity, which was why the court demanded to listen to his mother, Bedriye Hanım, around that time and hence the presence of Bedriye Gönüldaş at the hearing within the scope of the file with the mandate no 2010/37 by the Family Court of Beyoğlu was requested. However, Mehmet Tatlıcı’s mother did not show up at any of the hearings, despite the summons of the court.

In brief, there is a document called “Subrogation” in the hands of Mehmet Tatlıcı, which he even uses in the court in America, and this document allegedly bears a “fingerprint”, which is supposed to belong to his mother, Bedriye Hanım, who is illiterate and over the age of 90; however (and despite the court summons, requesting the presence of Bedriye Gönüldaş at the court through the 1st Family Court of Beyoğlu, which is the authority, handling the lawsuit process in Turkey on behalf of the American court), there is no Bedriye Hanım to show up at the court in question and say “yes, I gave this document to my son Mehmet Tatlıcı and it is my ‘fingerprint’ that is seen at the bottom of it”… (For detailed information, please see: “’Fake Fingerprint’ Move from Mehmet Tatlıcı” news piece).

And American Justice unfortunately keeps “being fed” with all of these games of Mehmet Tatlıcı…

That is because the American Justice is not trying to find the answers to the following questions, underlying the “charade” of Mehmet Tatlıcı here:

Does this “fingerprint” really belong to Bedriye Hanım, mother to Mehmet Tatlıcı and first wife of late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı?

Does Bedriye Hanım, who is illiterate (is claimed to have signed the documents with her fingerprint) really know the content of “Subrogation”?

If she is aware of everything with the document she is claimed to have signed with her fingerprint, why does not Bedriye Hanım answer the summons of the court and give her statement to verify all of it?

Does the fact that she is unaware of all of these developments underlie the failure of Bedriye Gönüldaş to respond to the summons and be present at the court?

Therefore, is the “fingerprint” that is claimed to belong to Bedriye Gönüldaş, mother of Mehmet Tatlıcı, fake?

Since the American Justice is not looking for answers to these questions, Mehmet Tatlıcı very well keeps deceiving the justice over there for a decade, for he failed to do so in Turkey

And despite the fact that the document Mehmet Tatlıcı submitted to the courts in America with the “fingerprint”, which he claimed to belong to his mother, turning out to be completely fake… This “legal farce” which has been in play for the past decade is being played just how Mehmet Tatlıcı wants it to be and the American judges, handling the cases he files, just cannot open their eyes to the plots of Mehmet Tatlıcı unfortunately; so they keep signing off on this “legal farce”…

  1. Mehmet Tatlıcı tried to make it look like laws that do not exist in Turkey actually did:

Mehmet Tatlıcı, in a dictum he had his lawyer in Turkey penned, depicted some non-existent articles from our current Civil Code as if they exist and distorted the truth and relayed some of the articles from it differently than they actually are during the cases he initiated in America for his gain. Then, he submitted the dicta to the courts in Florida with their translations, which were verified by a “sworn notary” (For detailed information, please see: “How Does Mehmet Tatlıcı Deceive the Courts? news piece).

When it was later revealed these so-called sworn translations with “notarization” were completely arranged/fabricated, he merely said with a brazen face “the translator must have confused the papers” and tried to clear himself. (Please see: “The Lake Fermented, Hodja?” news piece).

Furthermore, in yet another case he initiated in Florida, Mehmet Tatlıcı gave the wrong address on behalf of one of the parties in the case, so when the court sent the summons to the party in question, they were naturally not received, for such an address does not exist; hence, Mehmet Tatlıcı “managed” to have the court rule a verdict to their detriment with such “cunningness”… (Please see: “Collect the Thistle from the Mountains and Spoon-feed the Camel With it…” news piece).

  1. Mehmet Tatlıcı’s efforts to hide the redenomination of Turkish Lira from American Justice:

Another one of the “interesting” paths Mehmet Tatlıcı pursues in the cases in Florida was his cunning game to return the value of immovable properties within the estate to before the redenomination of Turkish Lira:

Mehmet Tatlıcı was also trying to use the truth of redenomination of Turkish Lira (as was published in the Official Gazette dated January 31st, 2004 and is executed as of January 1st, 2005) to deceive the courts in America.

As he did so, he was also “fine tuning” in his mind over the 6 zeroes that were removed from the Turkish Lira with the redenomination (with a mindset that overlooks all of these), let alone the foreign exchange differences between American Dollar and Turkish Lira; because in America, Mehmet Tatlıcı demanded his mother’s monthly alimony amount over the old 5,000,000 TL, which was the court designated amount at the time of the divorce, as if it is the current amount in Turkish Liras.

However, the judicial process in Turkey included verdicts, ruled by Turkish courts. Accordingly, when 6 zeroes were removed with the redenomination, amounts in TL were to be converted to YTL, which means that the non-pecuniary damages to be received by Bedriye Hanım would be 1,000,000,000 TL with the old Turkish Lira and 1,000 YTL with the new currency, while the monthly alimony would be 5 YTL per month, whereas it used to be 5,000,000 TL with the old currency.

Moreover, an update of these amounts was not in question. This being the case, Mehmet Tatlıcı was still asking for “astronomical” amounts of money by ignoring the redenomination of Turkish Lira during a case, which he moved to the courts in America with the claim that his mother was a victim here… (For detailed information, please see: “New “Maneuvers” of Mehmet Tatlıcı in Florida” news piece).

  1. Mehmet Tatlıcı intentionally and conspiratorially submits wrong addresses for the family members he sues in America:

Mehmet Tatlıcı carries on with his “well-known methods” and “what if it works” mindset in the cases he filed in America, for he wanted to try his luck there, since he could deceive Turkish justice with the lawsuits he filed for in Turkey, in order to take advantage of the “loopholes” of the American judicial system.

Here is how the “plot” Mehmet Tatlıcı set up to deceive the courts in America works:

– During the cases he filed in America, which all target the family members, who carry the same last name as his, Mehmet Tatlıcı gave wrong addresses to the courts on purpose for the family members he sues, who are the other heirs of the inheritance his late father, Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı, left behind…

– During this process, Mehmet Tatlıcı gave only one right address to the court – his own – and the address information of all other parties were willingly and knowingly submitted with fake versions

– Therefore, the sued parties and the other parties in the lawsuit fail to receive the documents, sent by the American courts, for they are thought to reside at these addresses, which is why they are never aware of this plot of Mehmet Tatlıcı in America.

Who are the parties of the lawsuits Mehmet Tatlıcı filed in America and why do they not know about the cases there?

That is because during the cases he initiated in America, Mehmet Tatlıcı provided wrong addresses to the court, on behalf of the members of Tatlıcı family – his older brother Ahmet Tatlıcı and children of his late older brother, Bedriye Kamer Tatlıcı and Salih Ziya Tatlıcı, as well as Nurten Tatlıcı, second wife and partner of life of late Mehmet Salih Bey for 43 year, and Uğur Tatlıcı, youngest son of Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı from this marriage, whom he sued numerous times in Turkey and America (all of whom are heirs of the inheritance of late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı, which is handled in Turkey).

Mehmet Tatlıcı declares to the American court the wrong address on behalf of the parties of the lawsuit – he provides the location known as Beykoz Konakları compound in Istanbul, where he also resides. The address in question for the other parties is the security booth of the compound

According to the address information Mehmet Tatlıcı provide to the courts, he resides at Beykoz Konakları compound; yet, the other heirs, who are also the parties in these cases, do not live there and they most definitely do not reside at the Security Unit of the compound…

In short, no other party except for Mehmet Tatlıcı reside at Beykoz Konakları Compound and Mehmet Tatlıcı is fully aware of it.

Furthermore, the security at the compound never send back the letters of shipments with the name Tatlıcı on them, because Mehmet Tatlıcı lives there. Since he knows this very well, he knowingly, willingly and conspiratorially deceives the courts in America as such…

So much so that Mehmet Tatlıcı might as well have “instructed” the security officers there to never return any documents with the last name “TATLICI” on them; for a “price” of course…

The court, handling the case Mehmet Tatlıcı initiated in the state of Florida of United States of America, takes action, assuming that the parties of the case received the official notices by the court, since they were received by the employees of Beykoz Konakları Compound. The parties are not aware of the case, therefore the cases in question are always conducted in their absence and since they are not represented in America, the judges there rule verdicts to Mehmet Tatlıcı’s favor almost all the time… (For detailed information about this, please see: “Mehmet Tatlıcı Finds ‘Goldmine’ in Florida” news piece).

Mehmet Tatlıcı has displayed these “games of providing wrong addresses” in the past as well:

During another legal process Mehmet Tatlıcı initiated in the past against Uğur Tatlıcı, the notices that were supposed to be sent to Uğur Tatlıcı’s former wife from the courts in America were sent to the Security Unit of Beykoz Konakları Compound due to the wrong address submission of Mehmet Tatlıcı again. Despite the party’s failure to receive these notices, as well as their lack of knowledge, the court in Florida was wrongfully informed that the party did, in fact, receive the notice, which was why the party ruled in Mehmet Tatlıcı’s favor in their absence… (For detailed information about this, please see: “Collect the Thistle from the Mountains and Spoon-feed the Camel With it news piece).

These games Mehmet Tatlıcı plays in America are of criminal quality in Turkey with penal sanctions; but what about America?…

As a matter of fact, this erroneous provision of address information by Mehmet Tatlıcı to the courts in America on behalf of the parties of the lawsuit and doing it knowingly and willingly, is a crime in Turkey with penal sanctions.

Mehmet Tatlıcı filed tens of inheritance cases in Turkey too and he is fully aware of the fact that these family members, who all carry his last name as well, do not officially reside in Beykoz Konakları Compound.

Mehmet Tatlıcı does in America what he failed to do in Turkey with a brazen face and keeps deceiving the courts there as such. The security officers at Beykoz Konakları Compound, on the other hand, keep receiving all the notices with Tatlıcı last name, for Mehmet Tatlıcı appears to reside there (and perhaps even “instructed” the officers to do so); thus, courts in America assume that the parties received the notices and the course of the case is followed according to this assumption.

Yet, in reality, the parties, subject to the cases Mehmet Tatlıcı filed in America, are never informed about these developments and they only hear about it with the verdicts courts there rule to their detriment and when “everything is said and done already”…

What a plot, right? We are leaving the answer at the discretion of our readers…

THE NEW GAME OF MEHMET TATLICI, WHO DID ALL OF THE AFOREMENTIONED THINGS IN TURKEY AND AMERICA: “I WOULD LIKE TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT AND SETTLE!”

Always playing his game as we have mentioned above, Mehmet Tatlıcı could not reach his goal in America either and had to deploy his plot of “mediation” nowadays:

As we have mentioned above, Mehmet Tatlıcı tried to “feed” all of these “plots and games” to Turkish judges and prosecutors within the legal system in Turkey and when he failed to achieve it, he tried to do the same to American Justice and has been trying for the last decade…

However, despite the fact that he has sued Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı multiple times over there, he lost all of them, because he could not deliver a single document to support his claims. Now with the same fear of losing the actual lawsuit, Mehmet Tatlıcı demanded mediation and unilaterally so, which would suspend the hearings and finalization of the case he filed there.

His demand was to come to an agreement with Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı – if you can believe it – by sitting at the same table as them before a court-appointed mediator…

Before we shed light on the truth, underlying this new “move” of Mehmet Tatlıcı, we would like to share some legal facts with our readers at this juncture:

THE VERDICTS OF THE JUDGES IN AMERICA THAT DEFY THE LAW OF THEIR OWN COUNTRY AS WELL AS INTERNATIONAL LAW

At this point, there are significant legal facts that Mehmet Tatlıcı tries to get past by American courts and the judges there overlook…

When the unjust and unlawful decisions and biased attitudes of American Judges Jeffrey D.G. and Jamie G. during the unjust and unlawful inheritance case Mehmet Tatlıcı initiated in America is examined, the following matters catch attention (the details of which we will provide to our readers in further sections):

  1. Above all else, the mutual agreements between United States of America and Republic of Turkey states “Succession is governed by the law of the State of nation of the deceased. The relevant country’s law is applied to issue pertaining to the immovables within the inheritance” and according to the laws and rules, pointed out by international law, “Laws of State of nation of the deceased are applied in inheritance cases”, which are clearly designated articles.

In this case, since late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı was a citizen of the Republic of Turkey and all of the immovables within his estate, official will and inheritance all exist within the borders of the Republic of Turkey and there is neither a single immovable under his name in America nor a bank account with his name there, the legal process, initiated by Mehmet Tatlıcı in the United States of America had to follow the framework, designated by Turkish Law in compliance and execution. Agreements between the two countries, as well as the international conventions, signed and accepted by both countries also state the same.

That being the case, American judges signed off on a lawlessness before all else, when they accepted the petition, submitted to them by Mehmet Tatlıcı in America and started the legal process with it.

  1. The same judges, Judge Jeffrey D.G. and Judge Jamie G., displayed another example of lawlessness, when they attempted to conduct the process of mediation by only taking into consideration American laws and legal procedures, which are not covered in Turkish Inheritance Law; in addition to another example, when they accepted the application of Mehmet Tatlıcı only and started the process without the consent and confirmation of other heirs, who are subject to the estate as well.
  1. The judges, who accepted and handled the lawsuit Mehmet Tatlıcı filed against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı in America before, have signed off on yet another important legal error and Judges Jeffrey D.G. and Jamie G. continue with this error nowadays: 

It is an error, for according to the laws and judicial procedures of the American legal system, an heir with a reserved portion of the inheritance cannot file an inheritance lawsuit by himself/herself…

In other words, Mehmet Tatlıcı, as an heir, who is to benefit from his late father Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı’s inheritance as per his official will, which became definite in the legal process in Turkey, does not have the right to initiate an inheritance case in America all by himself…

There is a clear and definite article in question within the American legal system; unfortunately, there are also American judges at this point, who accepted the case Mehmet Tatlıcı filed for in America. By doing so, they signed off on a substantial, legal mistake, for they violated the judicial procedures of their own country – the United States of America. At the present time, the two judges, Jeffrey D.G. and Jamie G., who insist on continuing these legal mistakes, basically keep playing into the hands of Mehmet Tatlıcı with the verdicts they rule now…

Before we move on to the details of these examples of lawlessness, we investigated what these judges, who rule unjust and unlawful verdicts, have done and what kind of verdicts they ruled in the past with which justifications and came up with shameful answers for both humanity and the law…

Here are some examples:

  • THE ONE WHO LEFT THE INHERITANCE IS TURKISH, THE PLAINTIFF IS TURKISH, THE DEFENDANTS ARE TURKISH, PROPERTIES IN THE ESTATE ARE IN TURKEY; YET THE INHERITANCE CASE IS HANDLED IN AMERICA?!…

The main subject of these inheritance cases Mehmet Tatlıcı initiated in America was late businessman Mehmet Tatlıcı; he and all of the heirs in question are Turkish citizens and they all reside in Turkey; therefore, matters concerning the estate and inheritance must have been handled in Turkey and more importantly; the procedures and principles, which should have been adopted in such inheritance cases handled abroad must have taken into consideration Turkish Law and International Law.

Furthermore, another legal process was in effect with the inheritance cases Mehmet Tatlıcı had initiated against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı in Turkey for the last decade, following the death of Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı. Mehmet Tatlıcı lost all of the cases he filed in Turkey; thus, there was definite court and Supreme Court rulings against Mehmet Tatlıcı in all of them and they were all legally finalized in Turkey

That being the case, filing for “parallel” inheritance cases in America with those in Turkey is definitely a legal comedy…

Still, the American judges placed Turkish Law, which must be taken as a basis in such inheritance cases, as well as two very important international conventions between the two countries (Act on International Private and Civil Procedure Law and Hague Convention of 1 August 1989 on the Law Applicable to Succession to the Estates of Deceased Persons) on one side and more importantly, they ignored the process of inheritance cases that have been ongoing for years in Turkey, while a significant part of it came to a certain point (and all of them were finalized to the detriment of Mehmet Tatlıcı and legally so), approving the initiation of such cases in America in an unlawful way…

Despite all these games in the cases he filed with unjust, unlawful and baseless claims there, Mehmet Tatlıcı was never able to prove these claims that he, himself, made up, and never reached a conclusion he wanted to. Therefore, he knew very well that it would be impossible to acquire the results he wants during the legal process there too…

That is exactly why Mehmet Tatlıcı filed tens of lawsuits in Turkey against all of the family members with the last name Tatlıcı (including his wife of 25 years and his own children), filed tens of criminal complaints against them and painted an attitude that is far away from coming to an agreement or settling; nowadays, he moves with a brazen face, trying to paint an “agreement-friendly” picture before the eyes of the judges in America…

How “sincere” is Mehmet Tatlıcı?

After all, everything Mehmet Tatlıcı did to the family members after the death of his late father Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı, makes one ask the question of how “sincere” he actually is  (sincerity: is a word derived from sincerus in Latin, which means pure) with this new move:

Any way at all, not to mention his failure to even consider an agreement with them in Turkey, why did Mehmet Tatlıcı want to give the image that he was trying to find a way to “settle” with Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, whom he sued tens of times, in addition to 15 criminal complaints he filed about them, via an American “mediator”, which was obviously a deception and what was his real purpose of doing this?

The investigations of our news crew about Mehmet Tatlıcı and what he had been doing in America clearly revealed that he was trying to “press” Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, whom he had been targeting for years, over “other calculations”, rather than a “pursuit for settlement” with this new legal charade…

As he deployed this plot, Mehmet Tatlıcı naturally had other things he “calculated” beforehand and the presence of Jeffrey D.G. and Jamie G., who play right into his hands, made things even easier for him:

MEHMET TATLICI’S “CUNNINGS” DURING HIS SO-CALLED PURSUIT OF SETTLEMENT

Before all else, Mehmet Tatlıcı knew very well that the person he was suing, Nurten Tatlıcı, who was almost 70 years old and suffered from a disorder called vertigo, which was proven with doctor’s reports, was not in a condition to fly all the way to America and be present at these mediation hearings that were supposed to be held in the state of Florida of America due to her health issues…

Vertigo is a disorder that manifests in forms of dizziness and is often observed in the elderly. A person, who suffers from this disease, cannot medically handle a 14-15 hour flight (excluding the waiting period at airports and in planes) to the East Coast of America from Istanbul (e.g., Florida).

These matters represent a serious obstacle before Nurten Tatlıcı’s presence at the mediation hearing, which was planned in Florida. Her disorder was proven with a doctor’s report as well. These facts were also added to the case file in America by Nurten Tatlıcı’s lawyers in Florida, along with the official proof in addendum.

  1. AMERICAN JUDGES JAMIE G. AND JEFFREY D.G. IGNORE THE MEDICAL REPORTS AND FORCE AN ELDERLY PERSON TO TAKE A LONG FLIGHT

Due to the aforementioned reasons, Nurten Tatlıcı and Uğur Tatlıcı requested to be present at these mediation hearings via teleconference or videoconference; however, American judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. did not accept this very humane and fatal request of an elderly person. Contradicting both the law and human rights, they also did not consider it enough to ask for attendance via teleconference or videoconference, which can be done according to American legal procedures, forcing Nurten Tatlıcı to be physically present at the mediation hearings in Florida in person…

These were exactly the decisions Mehmet Tatlıcı wanted and expected with all his legal charades; because his actual purpose (considering his irreconcilable attitude so far) was to be able to say to American Justice, “Look, I came all the way from Istanbul (because I do want to settle) and it is Nurten and Uğur Tatlıcı, who do not want to come to an agreement, because they are not here”, for he knows that Nurten Tatlıcı cannot fly to America… And naturally, trying to acquire a result to his gain as he sees it…

Considering what Mehmet Tatlıcı and his lawyers in America did and pursued during this legal process, they basically “fed” their moves with the mindset of “what if it works” to the judges there…

Handling the case in America, judges Jeffrey D.G. and Jamie G. somehow ate up “this play” of Mehmet Tatlıcı, which he was staging with the mindset of “what if it works”; they were pushing Nurten Tatlıcı to come to America no matter what, despite her age, for she was almost 70 years old, and despite her present condition that does not allow her to travel, as well as forcing her to be present at the same table as Mehmet Tatlıcı for mediation. They did not accept any legal or humane excuse, overlooking even the rulings of the courts of the Republic of Turkey. On top of it all, American Judge Jamie G. was doing all of this with quite a “biased” and “scolding” tone against the American attorneys, representing Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı (which were recorded in the court’s records)…

In fact, the American attorneys, representing Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, were always present at the hearings and mediation meetings that are held/to be held during the cases Mehmet Tatlıcı filed for in America against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, carrying on to represent their clients, who were not able to be present there due to legitimate reasons. At the same time, Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı continued to be present at the mediation meetings via teleconferences from Turkey with Turkish-English sworn translators also present at the meetings in Florida…

But for some reason, American judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. did not think these sufficed and neither were Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı’s presence at the meetings via tele-videoconferences in the day and age of technology or their representation by their attorneys. They insisted to their attorneys that Nurten Tatlıcı, whose bill of health dictated that she cannot endure a 14-15 hour flight (because it may be fatal for her to do so), fly to America in person with a crude tone and attitude that was also in the court records: “Unless your client is physically present at this mediation hearing, I will refuse all of the legal claims and evidence you put forth in this lawsuit and will rule a verdict in her detriment…”

The same was valid for Uğur Tatlıcı…

Uğur Tatlıcı was also not able to be present at these hearings, for the mediation hearings coincided with the days of the visa crisis between Turkey and America and American Consulates in Turkey put a halt on all visa procedures at the time (and Uğur Tatlıcı did not have a valid visa back then). Consequently (as if their own consulates in Turkey did not stop all visa procedures) Judge Jamie G. did not accept the truth behind his justifiable excuse, which made Uğur Tatlıcı the target of his unjust and unlawful attacks. Thus, American lawyers of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, who represented them over there, kept being “scolded” at the case hearings…

  1. THEY FORCED UĞUR TATLICI TO TAKE A FLIGHT TO AMERICA WITH HIS BROKEN LEG AND MANDATORY BEDREST…

The investigations of our news crew revealed other lawlessness examples too:

Similarly, before the dates that coincide with another mediation meeting, Uğur Tatlıcı had an accident and broke his leg, which was refused by Judge Jamie G. as a legal reason of his failure to be present at the court…

Having lived with crutches for three months because of a fracture in the tibia bone, which carries the whole bodyweight, as well as having had an intensive treatment period that required bed rest, Uğur Tatlıcı was forced to fly to America in that condition, for the medical reports he submitted to the court via his lawyers in Florida was rejected by Judge Jamie G

As all these things were happening, Mehmet Tatlıcı was present in person at the hearings and mediation meetings with his American lawyers in the play he was staging with the mindset of “what if it works” and with his men, whom he introduced as his “lawyers”, trying to prove that the family members he sued did not have valid excuses for not being there. They were forcing Judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. to ignore the evidence and proof of their own, which they would present to the court, so that they would be deprived of their rights to defend themselves…

On top of it all, Mehmet Tatlıcı was demanding that his and his lawyers’ flights, accommodation and restaurant expenses, along with their retainers, be compensated by Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı…

  1. THEY TRY TO HAVE UĞUR AND NURTEN TATLICI PAY FOR THEIR INFLATED EXPENSES AND JUDGES JEFFREY D.G. AND JAMIE G. CONFIRM ALL THIS…

Mehmet Tatlıcı and his men, whom he introduces as his lawyers, fly from Turkey to America and back to Turkey again in “business class” seats, which are the “luxurious seats” (and the most expensive ones) of planes, enjoy their time in Florida at the most expensive rooms of the most luxurious five star hotels and try to have Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı pay for the expenses of what they eat and drink at the most luxurious restaurants and bars with the approval of the judges (Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G.), who virtually say yes to whatever they ask for…

Judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G., who are the judges handling the case, accept these demands of Mehmet Tatlıcı, ruling that all of the expenses shall be paid by Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı…

Another “actor” in this legal comedy was also taking the stage during the process of billing these expenses: the so-called estate representative Joshua Rosenberg…

SO-CALLED ESTATE REPRESENTATIVE JOSHUA ROSENBERG TAKES SIDE BY MEHMET TATLICI…

Josh Rosenberg is the estate representative, who was appointed by the court in Florida during the inheritance case Mehmet Tatlıcı filed there against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı. The existence of an estate representative in a case refers to the suitable, just and lawful management of the movable and immovable assets within the estate under the supervision of the court and an unbiased approach to both sides during the legal process (plaintiff-defendant).

However, as of the moment of his inclusion, “estate representative” Josh Rosenberg undertook the duty of presenting the boosted expenses of Mehmet Tatlıcı, his lawyers, who represent him in the case and the men, whom he has taken with him to America, to the courts, submitting them to judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G…

The investigations of our news crew allowed us to have access to very important information and documents that prove the bias of this so-called estate representative:

For example, this so-called estate representative, Josh Rosenberg, who is expected to remain impartial, goes to the luxurious restaurants of Florida’s Palm Beach with Mehmet Tatlıcı and his men (his American lawyer Jeremy Friedman and Victor Marian Stanciulescu, whom Mehmet Tatlıcı introduced as “his lawyer from Turkey” apparently), submits the bills of their meals together (in order to have Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı pay for them) to the court as we have mentioned above and somehow it is Judge Jamie G., who approves these requests without a question… (For detailed information, please see: “New Moves of Mehmet Tatlıcı and Josh Rosenberg to ‘Siphon the Inheritance’” news article).

“IMPARTIAL” REPRESENTATIVE GOES TO DINNER WITH MEHMET TATLICI AND HIS MEN…

The investigations of our news crew in Florida revealed that this “representative”, who was appointed by the court to join the legal process in an unbiased way, “hangs out” with Mehmet Tatlıcı and his lawyers – specifically at the luxurious restaurant by the Atlantic Ocean in West Palm Beach called The Circle at the Breakers, having a jolly time, eating and drinking…

This biased “estate representative” and the attitude he displays at a hearing would have been yet another significant piece of evidence, proving how biased he actually is; but let us pick up where we left off and leave that for later…

At this point, the legal comedy they “fed” to Judge Jamie G. was also displayed with brazen faces:

As we have explained above, Mehmet Tatlıcı was bringing along Victor Marian Stanciulescu with him to the case hearings and mediation meetings by saying, “He is my attorney and I brought him with me from Turkey”. Moreover, they were flying from Istanbul to Miami and from Miami to Istanbul in business class seats, which are the most expensive seats of the plane, staying at the most luxurious hotels of Florida, eating and drinking together in the most expensive restaurants and serving the bills of these endeavors to the courts with the hands of so-called impartial estate representative Josh Rosenberg, so that Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, who could not be present at the mediation hearings with legal and justified excuses, pay for them.

Another person, who failed to see all of this and signed off on this unfairness was Judge Jamie G. – one of the judges handling the case. The exaggerated expenses of Victor Marian Stanciulescu, who does not possess the title of lawyer and is merely a good man of Mehmet Tatlıcı, moving around with him, when in fact, he is a money laundering expert (as we have mentioned above), was being displayed as “expenses” to “cover up” everything with official documents, prepared by so-called estate representative Josh Rosenberg. They were then submitted to the American court and approved by the decision of an American judge (Jamie G.)…

The amount they requested (with an hourly fee of 400 USD) with the exaggerated list of expenses they submitted to the court for this international money laundering expert, introduced by Mehmet Tatlıcı with the fake name of Victor Stein after taking him all the way to Florida under the disguise of a “Turkish lawyer”, was a total of 12,720 USD

In short, Mehmet Tatlıcı and his lawyer in Florida, Jeremy D. Friedman, were asking for 12 thousand 720 USD from Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı over a Romanian man called Victor Marian Stanciulescu, who was assigned a role within this legal farce, the details of which we will explicate below, and is taken to the courts in America, as if he is a Turkish lawyer…

In the face of all of these incidents of lawlessness, Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı objected through their lawyers in Florida to these exaggerated bills, prepared and submitted to the courts with the hands of an estate representative (Joshua Rosenberg), who actually should have been unbiased, under the disguise of “expenses”, gave results and all of the expenses, billed under the name of Victor Marian Stanciulescu, regarding the case and mediation hearings in America, were decided to be excluded from the list of expenses by Mehmet Tatlıcı’s lawyer there, Jeremy Friedman.

As can be observed here, Mehmet Tatlıcı was playing all these games with the mindset of “what if it works” and with his men, who are more money laundering experts than lawyers. When their true colors were seen, they were brazenly taking a step back, but still continued to feed their legal comedy to the judges there…

There were also other pieces of evidence, unraveling the legal farce Mehmet Tatlıcı has been staging with the mindset of “what if it works” at the hearings there, showing how he was mocking American justice:

  1. A ROMANIAN EXPERT ON MONEY LAUNDERING IS SOLD TO AMERICAN COURTS AS A “TURKISH COUNSELOR”…

As we have mentioned above, Romanian Victor Marian Stanciulescu was present at these hearings under the guise of a “Turkish lawyer”, when in fact, he is a money laundering expert, who traveled there with Mehmet Tatlıcı.

The investigations of our news crew in Florida ensured that we had access to information and documents that prove this legal comedy:

For example, before the actual case, handled by Judge Jamie G. in Florida, there was a hearing on the date of February 8th, 2018, where a legal comedy was staged with the presence of the parties of the case (Mehmet Tatlıcı, who initiated the legal process and his American lawyer Jeremy Friedman were present together, while the other party – Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı – were represented by their lawyers there).

The hearing in question is called a “pretrial conference” in American law (where conflicts between the parties in question are evaluated and a meeting before another appointed judge is held). Mehmet Tatlıcı was present at this hearing with Romanian citizen Victor Marian Stanciulescu, whom he introduced as his lawyer from Turkey (when in fact, he is “an expert of money laundering).

Romanian money laundering expert Victor Marian Stanciulescu was introduced to Judge Charles B., who was the acting judge at this hearing, with the statement “This is Victor, he is a lawyer from Istanbul, Turkey,” (by Mehmet Tatlıcı’s lawyer in America, Jeremy Friedman, which can be found in court records) and the official records, bearing the names of the parties recorded Romanian Victor as a “Turkish lawyer”…

There was even talk of a particular matter at the hearing, where the judge asked “What does the Turkish lawyer have to say about this? to which “Turkish lawyer” Romanian Victor said, in English, “I am merely observing here, I have nothing to say about it”…

Similarly, during yet another hearing with Judge Jamie G. as the presiding judge on the date of October 19th, 2017, Mehmet Tatlıcı’s American lawyer Jeremy Friedman introduced Romanian money laundering expert Victor, who was at the side of Mehmet Tatlıcı again, by saying to Judge Jamie G.: “He is the lawyer of my client (Mehmet Tatlıcı), whom he brought with him from Turkey”…

This legal comedy that is staged as such was going down in history as it was, for it found a place in the official court records there…

MEHMET TATLICI’S GOOD MAN VICTOR MARIAN STANCIULESCU IS NOT REGISTERED AS A LAWYER IN TURKEY OR IN AMERICA; HOWEVER…

However, the investigations of our news crew have shown that Romanian Victor Marian Stanciulescu, who always took part in different hearing records of the case in Florida as a “Turkish lawyer” (when in fact, he is not even a Turkish citizen), is not a lawyer within Turkish or American bar associations. Therefore, he actually cannot represent Mehmet Tatlıcı or Turkey or even America legally…

In addition, other investigations of our news crew in Romania, Greek Cypriot Region and United States of America also revealed that Victor Marian Stanciulescu owns companies in international hubs of money laundering, such as the Greek Cypriot Region and Panama, as well as United States of America and that his actual occupation is “money laundering” under the guise of “consulting”, instead of being a “lawyer”. This also goes to show that Mehmet Tatlıcı has interest-based relations with Romanian Victor Marian Stanciulescu, besides pointing to the location of the millions of dollars of Mehmet Tatlıcı, which evaporated suddenly from Turkey (For detailed information, please see: “The “Off-Shore Games” and “Business Partners” of Mehmet Tatlıcı news piece).

All these investigations clearly show that estate representative Josh Rosenberg also took the side of Mehmet Tatlıcı during the pretrial conference we have mentioned:

  1. “THE IMPARTIAL REPRESENTATIVE” PRAISES MEHMET TATLICI’S LAWYER AND DISPARAGES UĞUR AND NURTEN TATLICI, WHILE THE JUDGES MERELY WATCH…

Undertaking “the role” of “estate representative” in this “legal comedy”, written by Mehmet Tatlıcı, the “actor” Joshua Rosenberg leapt onto the “stage” suddenly during a hearing, where he had no right to be directly involved, and blamed the defendants, Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, by failure to abide by court orders with the claim that he was appointed by the Court in terms of certain real estate properties, which are argued to be within the estate, and praised Jeremy Friedman, Mehmet Tatlıcı’s lawyer, putting him on a pedestal with his words…

During this hearing, Joshua Rosenberg, despite the fact that he was not given a turn to speak, suddenly and sternly stepped in and said: “These people (referring to Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı) did not show up at the mediation hearings, disregarding the court orders (referring to the unjust and unlawful decisions of Judge Jamie G.), despite being summoned time and again and how can you expect them to be present from now on?” He was asking calling out to both Judge Charles B. and the lawyers of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, forcing the judge of the hearing, Charles B., to rule unlawful verdicts against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı right then and there…

An estate representative, speaking as such, which can now be found in the court records too, is actually proof in and of itself, revealing how biased he is. Josh Rosenberg was the court-appointed estate representative for this case in Florida and it was legally expected from an estate representative to be entirely impartial; however, the fact of the matter, as was revealed by our news crew, was that Josh Rosenberg had already positioned himself, clearly and definitely, in a manner that would serve the interests of Mehmet Tatlıcı and his lawyer in Florida, Jeremy Friedman…

WHAT A LEGAL COMEDY, RIGHT?

In short, a “representative”, appointed by the court to be “impartial” throughout the case, was hanging out, eating and drinking with Mehmet Tatlıcı and his lawyers, who represent one of the parties in the case, then was stepping up at a hearing (despite that he has no legal rights to do so), raged against the other party, Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, scolding their lawyers before the eyes of the judge, while he was praising Mehmet Tatlıcı and his American lawyers and virtually scolding (presumptuously) the judge at the hearing. Consequently, he was representing a great example as to how carelessly this legal comedy in question was being staged with his biased words, which can also be found in the court records…

This is how the legal comedy, prepared over the script written by Mehmet Tatlıcı, is staged in America. Actors in this comedy show with Mehmet Tatlıcı and Attorney Jeremy Friedman in Florida in the lead, also include Victor Marian Stanciulescu, Romanian money laundering expert, who is introduced as a “Turkish Lawyer”, and Josh Rosenberg, so-called estate representative…

We explain the unjust and unlawful verdicts of Judge Jamie G. below and leave it at the discretion of our readers to decide whether it is justice or injustice:

HERE IS THE SUMMARY OF THE LAWLESSNESS EXAMPLES OVERLOOKED BY JUDGE JAMIE G.:

Romanian (money laundering expert, in reality) Victor Marian Stanciulescu takes part as a “Turkish lawyer” (despite the fact that he is neither a Turkish citizen nor a lawyer, registered in the bar associations of Turkey or United States of America) in the official court records in Florida courthouses and everything he utters are recorded as such in the minutes as such too.

Romanian Victor Marian Stanciulescu, who is neither Turkish nor is authorized to practice law in Turkey, states “My retainer fee is 400 USD and I am owed a total of 12,720 USD” with a brazen face, in exchange for “showing up” there, demanding that Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı pay the thousands of dollars in question through the documents, which were prepared by the hands of a “sided” estate representative in their ranks (Josh Rosenberg).

During this process, Joshua Rosenberg, who catch attention with his biased attitude, “forgets” that he has to remain unbiased and meets with Mehmet Tatlıcı, one of the parties of the case, Victor Marian Stanciulescu, Mehmet Tatlıcı’s good man and Romanian money laundering expert, and Jeremy Friedman, Mehmet Tatlıcı’s lawyer in Florida, eating and drinking at luxurious bars and restaurants and serving their bills to the courts for Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı to compensate under the title of “estate representative”, submitting “expenses” if you believe it.

Judge Jamie G., who is the judge at the case in question, insists on having Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı pay for these exaggerated expenses that are served to him; when their lawyer said “My clients claim that they would only compensate for the expenses of the mediator to carry out the mediation hearing, they do not feel obligated to pay for the inflated personal expenses of these people, for that would be unlawful and unfair”, Judge Jamie G. responded with threatening words: “Unless your clients pay for these amounts, I will repeat what I said about their absence in the mediation hearings; tell them that I will, once again, ignore all the evidence and claims they will put forth to defend themselves within the scope of the case and rule a verdict against them.”

Along with this attitude of Judge Jamie G., which makes one question his objectivity, he confirms all of these cases of lawlessness, while he keeps scolding the lawyers of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, who merely object to these unjust and unlawful gains, by saying “Your clients will pay or I will deprive them of their rights to defend themselves.”

Consequently, Mehmet Tatlıcı and his lawyer in Florida, Jeremy Friedman, keep feeding all of these games to American Judges, at an American courthouse, basically mocking “American Justice” as such

Consisting of Mehmet Tatlıcı, his American lawyer Jeremy Friedman, a money laundering expert, who does not bear the title of a lawyer in the least, Victor Marian Stanciulescu, and a biased estate representative, Joshua Rosenberg, this “organization” functions as we explained above and keeps mocking American Justice; on the other hand, Judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. keep “playing into their hands” with the unjust and unlawful decisions they make throughout this comedy, staged right before their eyes…

That is the essence of the matter and this is how the legal comedy is staged as it is…

(For detailed information about this, please see: “The Plot of Mehmet Tatlıcı and His Attorneys in America to Siphon the Inheritance”; “New Moves of Mehmet Tatlıcı and Josh Rosenberg to ‘Siphon the Inheritance’”; “Mehmet Tatlıcı Finds ‘Goldmine’ in Florida” and “Brand New Examples of American Injustice” news articles).

Now let us see what kind of a judge and what kind of a person Judge Jeffrey D.G. is, as one of the judges, who signed off on all of these incidents of lawlessness:

JUDGE Jeffrey D.G. – ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF LAWLESSNESS

The investigations of Tatlıcı Truths news crew in United States of America found that this judge, Judge Jeffrey D.G., did not only sign off on unjust and inhumane decisions in this case, but in other cases in the past as well:

This judge, much like the other judge, Jamie G., who was handling the same case, “became obsessed” with Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı’s failure to be present in Florida on legal and justified grounds, threatening them with ignoring the evidence they put forth during the legal process and finalizing the case to their detriment and forcing them to come to the mediation meeting with this biased, unjust and unfair approach of his, despite the fact that their lawyers, representing them, have been present at all the said meetings and the clients themselves joined in via telephone and/or videoconferences.

This judge, much like the other judge, Jamie G., ignores all the legal and lawful reasons that are put before them, the evidence and more importantly, the verdicts of the courts of THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY, as he dares to say “I do not accept any of these; you must come here and be present at these hearings in person; otherwise, I will overlook all of your claims in the case.” He basically forgets that he is a judge and possesses his current seat on behalf of the law with the requirement of being fair and just…

A JUDGE THAT CAN SIGN OFF ON UNJUST AND UNLAWFUL VERDICTS THAT VIOLATE HUMAN RIGHTS

The investigations of our news crew about this judge in question – Jeffrey D.G. – revealed what kind of a person he is and the extent to which he pushes the authority, given to him by his position as a judge, as well as the law itself with similar examples:

It turns out that this judge ruled verdicts with the authority given to him by the law that would be shameful for humanity.

Here is what Judge Jeffrey D.G. did, as the lead actor of the drama, which must be found shameful in the name of all of humanity:

According to the investigations of our news crew, here is how the events occurred:

A man called Dennis Nebus and a woman called Heather Hironimus in USA have a baby boy out of wedlock, whom they named Chase in 2010. According to the parental agreement of the couple, the mother had the custody of the child (on the condition that the child is circumcised by his father, after age 1).

However, the father, Dennis, does not fulfill his end of the bargain after the birth of his son and fails to carry on with the circumcision. After three years, the mother, Heather, reads some pieces (news about another child’s risk of losing his member, perhaps even his life, due to misconduct and severe bleeding) and is rather taken by them in the meantime. She changes her mind about the planned circumcision operation to be carried out with general anesthesia…

Consumed with the concerns of general anesthesia, not being suitable for such a young child, and even lethal outcomes, she goes to the Courthouse in Florida and declares that she would like to exclude the article concerning the circumcision from the agreement she signed with the father of the child. This court file ends up before Judge Jeffrey D.G

Judge Jeffrey D.G. shows what kind of a judge and human being he actually is…

Expected to represent justice, Judge Jeffrey D.G. rejects the request of the mother, Heather Hironimus, and rules that she shall consent to the child’s circumcision, otherwise she will be indefinitely jailed. The father, Dennis, who disappeared for three years and did not deal with the circumcision matter at all, “surfaces” all of a sudden and says “Heather objects to my son’s circumcision”…

Along with these developments, this matter starts to become a hot topic in local and national American news, discussed in social media, in addition to newspapers and television networks…

Now, when these events are taken into consideration, one wants to say “Do these parents have nothing else they do?” and “Man, are you going to have the child circumcised or not, just come to an agreement already and get this over with; it has been over three years since the birth and you still could not reach a conclusion, then you take things to court, which is then reflected in the media and you are just making fools of yourselves.”

The part that concerns us, on the other hand, is about the inhumane decisions of Judge Jeffrey D.G. upon further developments:

The mother does not want the operation for her child, but Judge Jeffrey D.G. threatens her with indefinite jail time:

Consequently, the mother, Heather Hironimus, objects, for she is worried that her child may experience severe bleeding as well (due to her being influenced by a similar news article). Judge Jeffrey D.G., on the other hand, rejects her objections as the mother of the child in question and virtually forces her to do something she does not wishes to do, threatening her with indefinite jail time.

Later, the mother Heather takes her 3.5 year old child and chooses to leave her home and seek asylum in a nearby women’s shelter. However, when the law enforcement officers cannot find the woman at home, Judge Jeffrey D.G. says “Go and find her wherever she is hiding and put her into jail, unless she abides by my orders and have her child circumcised.” Later, he really has Heather Hironimus jailed for an indefinite period

During this time, Judge Jeffrey D.G does not allow the mother to see her child either…

The same judge, Judge Jeffrey D.G, also prohibits the mother from talking to the media or journalists about this matter and from relaying her thoughts or experiences on social media accounts with a verdict…

In a country such as America, which is in the so-called forefront of human rights advocacy, Judge Jeffrey D.G. ignores the First Amendment of his very own country and Constitution, which concerns freedom of speech…

Moreover, Judge Jeffrey D.G., during the hearings of this case, never let a legal guardian be appointed to defend such a young child and did not even allow a pediatric psychiatrist testify for the mental health of this 3 year old child…

As can be seen, Judge Jeffrey D.G. violates the principles of fairness, objectivity and legal regulations, which are given to him by the law, for he puts the mother, Heather, in jail, forbids her from speaking to the media and does not let her see her 3 year old child. On top of it all, he does not let a legal guardian be appointed to such a young child during the hearings or allows the support of a pediatric mental health professional…

Finally, unfortunate mother Heather Hironimus, after being jailed for 9 days, cannot handle the jail time and being so far away from her child. Desperate for a solution, she finds herself having to sign the document, approving the circumcision of her son, which she was forced to, for Judge Jeffrey D.G. basically blackmailed her into it.

The investigations of our news crew in America helped us find the photographs of Heather Hironimus, taken as she was signing the document in question for the circumcision of her son, Chase (for she could not put up with the pressure from Judge Jeffrey D.G., life in jail and being away from her son).

We felt ashamed on behalf of all humanity, when we saw these photographs in the news meeting: Can circumcision be forced? Can a mother be jailed on grounds of not wanting to have her 3-4 year old child circumcised for she had her reasons?

WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF THIS WAS IN TURKEY?

During our daily editorial meeting we conduct with our news crew and editors, we evaluated this sensitive subject and the decisions of American judges for a while (including this circumcision). Furthermore, we did some research to see whether there are any other similar events in Turkey to what this American judge did and we wanted to share the results with you, our dear readers:

When we looked into the matter with journalists from other Muslim countries and citizens of the Republic of Turkey specifically, we chose to focus on Turkey, for Muslim population represents the majority in Turkey and we are people, who developed their beliefs with the guidance of Islam, respecting the traditions and foundations of this faith…

We said to ourselves that we represent the country of people, who naturally do not object to the circumcision of boys, according to Muslim faith and lifestyle, and even accept it with social tolerance and agreement…

We said to ourselves, in this country, children are circumcised with the consent of their family first and with specially celebrated ceremonies; therefore, what every Muslim boy experiences in our country during circumcision is a memory and this occurs with a social agreement due to the nature of our faith; so we decided, the matter of circumcision cannot even be debated here…

That being the case, we have not found a single shred of evidence in this country with a Muslim population in majority, where a child is forced to be circumcised, because a judge ruled so (as per the information revealed by our news crew); there is no record of such an incident in our legal history…

Moreover, we even did research to find an answer to the question of “what can anyone say to a mother from a different faith, who does not wish to have her child circumcised?” However, we could not find any cases in point either…

Thus, we have never seen a mother, go through such an unlawful and inhumane judicial process (as the American Judge Jeffrey D.G. put Heather Hironimus through), put into jail afterwards and is banned from speaking to the media…

We also thought of the following:

For instance, “If a mother, who is a Turkish citizen, living in Turkey, but is not a Muslim, does not want to have her boy circumcised, when the father of the boy in question is a Turkish citizen and is not Muslim either; would our judges put the mother in jail, because she does not want to have him circumcised, but his father does?” was another assumption we considered; however, we agreed upon our judges, not being able to rule such an inhumane verdict. That is also proven by the fact that we have found no such record of a similar incident happening throughout our legal history or being mentioned on media…

But still, Jeffrey D.G., who is a judge at Florida Courthouses of United States of America – a country that keeps “selling” us the story of the “rule of law”;

  • does not care that a mother, an American citizen too, objects to the circumcision of her child and puts her into jail with an inhumane decision,
  • tells the mother of the child, “I will keep you in jail indefinitely, unless you agree to the circumcision of this child” and “uses his position as a judge” to force into accepting the circumcision, oppressing her in an inhumane way as such,
  • forces her to sign a document for her approval of the operation, which he have had prepared, and rules the circumcision (despite his mother’s objections) of a child (who was 3 years old, when his mother changed her mind about the circumcision and 3.5, by the time the whole matter was talked about by American media) “on behalf of the law”…

Our readers can seek detailed information from the links below regarding the aforementioned event, which found quite a place for itself in American media, as well as the legal archives:

http://thegarrisoncenter.org/archives/tag/jeffrey-dana-gillen#ps5zluz2JFq7xx9p.99 (Legal Archives)

https://wandervogeldiary.wordpress.com/2015/05/ (Wandervogel Diaries – May 2015 Archive)

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/circumcision-fla-4-year-old-divides-parents-article-1.2084781 (New York Daily News – 20 January 2015)

https://www.browardpalmbeach.com/news/florida-mom-fights-court-order-to-circumcise-her-3-year-old-son-6454262 (Broward Palm Beach New Times – 14 May 2014)

https://www.browardpalmbeach.com/news/circumcision-case-judge-puts-gag-order-on-mother-fighting-for-son-not-to-be-circumcised-6448914 (Broward Palm Beach New Times – 19 November 2014)

https://www.browardpalmbeach.com/news/mother-of-boy-in-circumcision-case-has-vanished-with-child-judge-orders-her-to-return-6885606 (Broward Palm Beach New Times – 6 March 2015)

https://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/palm-beach/fl-circumcision-court-battle-hearing-20150310-story.html (South Florida Sun Sentinel – 10 March 2015)

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/woman-at-center-of-circumcision-battle-ordered-arrested/ (CBS News – 10 March 2015)

https://www.browardpalmbeach.com/news/fugitive-anti-circumcision-mom-arrested-6977896 (Broward Palm Beach New Times – 15 May 2015)

https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2015/05/15/fla-woman-who-fled-to-avoid-sons-circumcision-is-arrested (US News & World Report – Associated Press – 15 May 2015)

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/22/florida-mom-agrees-sons-circumcision-jail (The Guardian – 22 May 2015)

https://www.browardpalmbeach.com/news/activists-to-american-doctors-dont-circumcise-4-year-old-consent-was-forced-7008693 (Broward Palm Beach New Times – 29 May 2015)

JUDGE JEFFREY D.G., WHO SIGNED OFF ON THESE INHUMANE VERDICTS ALSO HANDLES THE LAWSUIT MEHMET TATLICI FILED FOR IN AMERICA…

In addition to the investigations of our news crew, this person called Jeffrey D.G., who made quite a name for himself with his inhumane decisions in the news that are covered in America’s local and national media and new agencies, which have gone down in the legal history with the legal archives of the country, is unfortunately a judge, who fulfills his duties at the courts in Florida, and defends his inhumane and unjust verdicts on grounds of having ruled them under the name of the law…

A shame, really; a shame for humanity and justice…

And this judge handles the case Mehmet Tatlıcı initiated against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı in America. He also keeps playing right into the hands of Mehmet Tatlıcı with his unjust and inhumane decisions, as are illustrated by all legal facts that we will explain in detail below, during the case, which Mehmet Tatlıcı served to him under the name of the law with all kinds of lawlessness.

This judge called Jeffrey D.G. ignores the finalized decisions of the law in Turkey, which were to the detriment of Mehmet Tatlıcı, and imposes “American (In)justice” upon innocent people like a bully

THE LAWLESSNESS STORIES CONDUCTED UNDER THE NAME OF SO-CALLED LAW

Targeted by him with his inhumane attitude, the innocent people, who live their own lives, on the other hand, include:

A mother called Heather Hironimus (who did not want to have her son circumcised, for she had her reasons), as we explained above: She was forced to jail time, then to sign the document of approval for her son’s circumcision;

Or other innocent people, who keep to themselves, such as Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı; they were not able to go to America due to health issues and other legally justifiable excuses (during the case filed by Mehmet Tatlıcı, who never wanted to settle during the cases that are ongoing in Turkey, but tries to paint a reconcilable image with a rather brazen face in America nowadays)…

Judge Jeffrey D.G. takes the power, given to him by the law, on to a whole new level of inhumanity and injustice by forcing Nurten Tatlıcı, who is almost 70 years old and suffers from vertigo, and Uğur Tatlıcı, who had to live with crutches due to a fracture in his leg and was ordered to bed rest by his doctors, to take a 14-15 hour flight to meet vis-à-vis with an arbitrator in Florida…

Moreover, Judge Jeffrey D.G. clearly utters the threat towards Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı with the words, “Unless you show up here in person, I will ignore everything you submitted for your defense and finalize the case to your detriment”, which can be found in the court records, without being uncomfortable in the least with regards to the law…

He does this despite the restriction order from the Turkish court, ruled against Mehmet Tatlıcı, forbidding him to be at least 50 meters distant from Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı on grounds of threatening…

Jeffrey D.G. overlooks all of the legal verdicts, ruled by Turkish courts, in a unilateral and unlawful manner, despite the existence of international conventions between the two countries and forces Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı to be physically present in the “mediation” meeting to be held in the State of Florida of America before an American mediator and with Mehmet Tatlıcı; just like when he sent a mother to jail, the details of which we have explained above at length…

He even goes so far as to say, “Unless you are physically present, I will ignore all of the steps you took for your defense during the case Mehmet Tatlıcı initiated against you and will not take your claims and evidence into consideration”

The man in question, Mehmet Tatlıcı, filed tens of lawsuits against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı on unjust, unlawful and baseless grounds in Turkey, let alone coming to an agreement or settling, and lost each and every one of them. The man in question, Mehmet Tatlıcı, filed a total of 15 criminal complaints against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı on unjust, unlawful and baseless grounds and lost each and every one of them.

Now the very same man, Mehmet Tatlıcı, shows up at the hearing with the Romanian money laundering expert by his side, Victor Marian Stanciulescu, (whom he deceivingly introduced to the courts as “He is my lawyer from Turkey”), lawyer Jeremy D. Friedman and estate representative, Joshua H. Rosenberg, standing before Judge Jeffrey D.G. with an angelic face and carelessly saying: “I want to come to an agreement; look, I came all the way from Turkey. However, my ‘step mother’ (referring to Nurten Tatlıcı, second wife of late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı) and my step brother (Uğur Tatlıcı) do not, because they do not want to do so. Just look past all of the defense claims and the evidence they submitted to the court in this case I filed against them and finalize this lawsuit for me to win”…

We are leaving it at the discretion of our readers…

THE STORY OF JUDGE JEFFREY D.G.

The investigations of our news crew about Judge Jeffrey D.G. revealed that he graduated from Culver Military Academy and currently owns a company on yoghurt making-dairy farming.

Judge Jeffrey D.G. states the following concerning his alma mater, Culver Military Academy, about the goals it sets for its students:

“Through integrated programs that place importance on building character, Culver educates its students for them to exhibit leadership and responsible citizenship by improving them as a whole – mentally, spiritually and physically…”

We are leaving it to our readers to determine how well Judge Jeffrey D.G. received the education mentality we mentioned above, as an alumni of Culver Military Academy with the unlawful and inhumane decisions he makes at his position as a judge and content ourselves with merely saying that we wish he just spends his time with dairy business, instead of having a decisive position in the name of the law…

As the evidence above shows, which were also reflected on official court records and news on various media, Judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G., who handle the cases Mehmet Tatlıcı filed against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı in America, draw unlawful profiles as judges as they handle the cases “on behalf of the law”, whereas they were there to make just decisions.

Catching attention with their verdicts to the detriment of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, but always favoring Mehmet Tatlıcı (despite being unjust, unlawful and biased), these two judges are introduced very well so far. Now let us move on to the details of the other examples of lawlessness, which can be observed in their other verdicts:

EXAMPLES OF LAWLESSNESS DISPLAYED BY JUDGE JAMIE G. AND JUDGE JAMIE D.G.:

We would like to bring to the attention of our readers the lawlessness that can be observed in the decisions these two judges make – Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G., who appear to be far away from being aware of how important their positions as judges are within the ruling process on behalf of the law:

Lawlessness 1:

The law that must be practiced during the cases Mehmet Tatlıcı filed in the state of Florida in America is Turkish Law. However, the American judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G., whom we covered above with respect to the verdicts they rule and attitudes and behaviors they assume during the trials to determine the kind of judges and human beings they actually are, which can also be observed in the data and information that can be found on American media and legal archives, disregard the bilateral legal conventions between Turkey and United States of America, as well as international law and insist on practicing American Law instead (and they interpret it as it suits them too).

Here is the truth as to what this lawlessness is:

– Within this inheritance case that is handled in the state of Florida in the United States of America; the legator, Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı, who passed away on February 22nd, 2009; Nurten Tatlıcı and Uğur Tatlıcı, who are parties in the case and Mehmet Tatlıcı, who initiated the case, are all citizens of the Republic of Turkey.

– Late Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı was deceased in Istanbul, Turkey on the date of February 22nd, 2009. According to the certificate of inheritance dated May 3rd, 2018 with no 2012/85 E., 2018/405 K. of the 8th Civil Court of Peace of Istanbul, heirs of late Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı are listed as Nurten Tatlıcı, Uğur Tatlıcı, Ahmet Tatlıcı, Mehmet Tatlıcı, Salih Ziya Titiz and Bedriye Kamer Tatlıcı, who are all citizens of the Republic of Turkey.

In addition to the aforementioned facts, it must be noted that the disaccords that are ongoing in Florida are all cases on inheritance-based claims; therefore, the law that must be practiced in Florida courthouses and in the judicial process must be identified first.

Accordingly, it is a legal obligation to examine the international conventions, designating the jurisdiction of the court of Florida:

According to international law;

Article 3/1 of Hague Convention of 1 August 1989 on the Law Applicable to Succession to the Estates of Deceased Persons stipulates;

Succession is governed by the law of the State in which the deceased at the time of his death was habitually resident, if he was then a national of that State.” A person may designate the law of a particular State to govern the succession to the whole of his estate. The designation will be effective only if at the time of the designation or of his death such person was a national of that State or had his habitual residence there.

Article 2 of the same convention also stipulates;

Succession is also governed by the law of the State in which the deceased at the time of his death was habitually resident, if he had been resident there for a period of no less than five years immediately preceding his death.”

Moreover, Article 20/1 titled “Inheritance” of Act on International Private and Civil Procedure Law numbered 5178, clearly stipulates:

The national law of the deceased shall govern inheritance. Turkish law shall apply to immovable property located in Turkey.”

Therefore, the law that must be taken into consideration regarding this inheritance case Mehmet Tatlıcı initiated in Florida is Turkish Law and its stipulations.

That being the case, American judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. sign off on a great lawlessness, despite the laws’ decree to do the opposite, by never taking into consideration this fact and the stipulations of Turkish Law…

Lawlessness 2:

The lawsuit for land registration, revocation and action for reduction Mehmet Tatlıcı and other heirs, Ahmet Tatlıcı and Salih Ziya Tatlıcı, filed concerning the immovables late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı left to Nurten Tatlıcı and Uğur Tatlıcı in his will are handled within the scope of file no 2010/61 of the 19th Civil Court of First Instance of Istanbul and is yet to be finalized.

The official records of the case file in Turkey show that information regarding some of the immovables (land registrations and title deed registries of which do not bear the name of late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı and they never have; they were always the personal properties of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı) are provided in a petition dated March 16th, 2016, submitted to the court by the attorney of Mehmet Tatlıcı, and it was claimed that (with no legal or lawful evidence and based only on the claim Mehmet Tatlıcı made up himself) they were sold/smuggled and the money from the sales were put into a bank account in Turkey after the death of Mehmet Salih Tatlici.

That being the case, the lawyer, who was representing Mehmet Tatlıcı in a case in Istanbul, also stated, which can be found in the court records: “The entirety of the amounts in questions represent the subject of the case of the action for reduction before the honorable court.”

 Thus, Mehmet Tatlıcı, along with the aforementioned statement of his lawyer, was accepting the jurisdiction of Turkish Courts with respect to the immovables in Florida and explicitly uttering his demand in this matter via his Turkish lawyer at the hearing…

Moreover, Mehmet Tatlıcı was in a constant attempt to HIDE these statements from the courts in America; statements that can be found in the official court records through the words of his lawyer there…

In other words, Mehmet Tatlıcı plays both sides: Differently in Turkey and differently in America…

Mehmet Tatlıcı tries to hide the truth he accepted in Turkey from American Justice over there…

In addition to this crystal clear request of the lawyer, representing Mehmet Tatlıcı in the case he filed against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, it must be noted that the evaluation regarding the demands for Mehmet Tatlıcı’s immovables in Florida fall clearly within the jurisdiction of Turkish courts, considering international law; i.e. the provisions of Hague Convention of 1 August 1989 on the Law Applicable to Succession to the Estates of Deceased Persons and Act on International Private and and Civil Procedure Law numbered 5718.

It is further proof that Mehmet Tatlıcı also accepted it through the statement of his lawyer, the details of which can be found in the court records in the case file in Istanbul from the date of March 16th, 2016…

Still, Mehmet Tatlıcı is trying to hide this fact, which he actually accepted in the case he filed in Turkey via the words his lawyer uttered himself, from the judges and case files in America with a brazen face. Signing off on various events of lawlessness, Judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G., on the other hand, ignore the clearly stated provisions of international law, along with all the documents Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı submit to them via their lawyers there. They remain viewers of these “legal charades” of Mehmet Tatlıcı and keep disregarding the Turkish law, which must be practiced in the case they are handling in Florida, as well as the verdicts and declarations of the Turkish judicial process.

Thus, there is a great lawlessness in question:

As we have mentioned above, it is quite clear that Turkish courts have the jurisdiction in the resolution of conflicts in such cases, as well as in disagreements. This fact was furthermore accepted and declared by Mehmet Tatlıcı himself, during a case he filed in Istanbul, via the words of his lawyer in the 19th Civil Court of First Instance of Istanbul – words, which can be seen in both the case files and court records.

There is significant legal proof and still, Mehmet Tatlıcı goes to America, files the lawsuit by denying what he accepted in Turkey and the American judges of the case and Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. keep disregarding these facts too…

Lawlessness 3:

Once Mehmet Tatlıcı found that things were not going as he wished during the trials in Florida, he suddenly requested mediation, claiming that “he wants to come to an agreement with the other party.”

So how sincere is Mehmet Tatlıcı in this new move of his? (sincerity: is a word derived from sincerus in Latin, which means pure).

At this point, it is clearly seen that Mehmet Tatlıcı is playing “his game” in America, rather than Turkey this time:

During the inheritance cases in Turkey, presiding judges always asked his lawyers whether they want to come to an agreement or not and their responses have always been negative. The documents in the trial records especially prove that Turkish courts encourage agreement; yet, Mehmet Tatlıcı remained silent in the face of everything…

For example, at the hearing on September 27th, 2019 of the lawsuit for land registration, revocation and action for reduction Mehmet Tatlıcı and other heirs, Ahmet Tatlıcı and Salih Ziya Tatlıcı (also his older brothers), filed (against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı) at the 19th Civil Court of First Instance of Istanbul with the file no 2010/61, the presiding judge stated:

“The parties are encouraged to come to an agreement by our Magistrate, for the case has been ongoing since 2010 and they declared their concerns about the time passed.”

This statement was recorded in the hearing’s records. As it is observed, the parties were asked to come to an agreement; however, Bahri Bayram Belen, Esq., who was the lawyer of Mehmet Tatlıcı at that particular hearing, remained silent despite his presence.

Keeping “silent” in the face of such a question is equivalent to not favoring legal agreements and even being against it…

Moreover, the matter as we covered above under the subsection Lawlessness 2 shall not be overlooked; accordingly, Mehmet Tatlıcı’s lawyer, in the very same case file that can be found in a petition he submitted on March 16th, 2016, clearly mentions some real estate properties and bank accounts in Florida within the scope of the case, which was handled in Istanbul, and states that all of them (properties and bank accounts in Florida) represent the subject of the action for reduction in Istanbul.

Well then, why did Mehmet Tatlıcı insist on remaining silent in the face of the agreement requests of the judges of Turkish courts, despite the same immovables, being the subject of cases in both Turkish and Florida courts?

The answer is clear:

It is because Mehmet Tatlıcı does NOT want to come to an agreement; he merely wants to harass Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı with all of these moves, wear them out, bring them to the point of exhaustion so that he can acquire more shares from the inheritance, when he definitely does not deserve to have them. Mehmet Tatlıcı illustrated this plan clearly with everything that he has done so far and as one can observe in other examples of lawlessness we will cover below, his games are not to be proven either:

Lawlessness 4:

Mehmet Tatlıcı’s actions and attitudes targeting Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı so far clearly show that the real purpose of his demands for mediation in Florida is not about obtaining results; it is about harassing Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı.

There are actually many cases in point throughout the legal process that has been ongoing for over a decade since the death of late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı on February 22nd, 2009:

Mehmet Tatlıcı filed many groundless criminal complaints about Nurten and Uğur Tatlıcı to the Office of Prosecution in Turkey. They were all dismissed by prosecutors with the “decision of non-prosecution.” Coming to an agreement with Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı aside, Mehmet Tatlıcı filed a total of 15 unjust, unlawful and baseless criminal complaints against them over claims that appear to be made up by him and do not even seem real, for he was never able to procure concerning evidence to the prosecution.

In other words, there are 15 false and groundless criminal complaints, which were finalized to Mehmet Tatlıcı’s detriment by the offices of prosecution with “the decision of non-prosecution” in the last decade…

The normal course of life allows no one to resort to such inapt legal ways to harass innocent people, who merely keep to themselves. However, that is exactly what Mehmet Tatlıcı has been doing to Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı in Turkey – a harassing attitude that is far away from any agreement…

Thus, it is very clear that Mehmet Tatlıcı had no legally justifiable reasons to demand mediation in America, which is also against honesty, and Mehmet Tatlıcı has already proven with all of his dishonorable moves that what he wants is definitely not about coming to an agreement

This is actually why the office of prosecution has 4 ongoing investigations against Mehmet Tatlıcı on grounds of the offense of slander; the accusations were accepted by the criminal court with even another penal case against Mehmet Tatlıcı in Turkey with a request of a total of 16 year-imprisonment on grounds of 4 different slander indictments

The office of prosecution initiated the investigations that led to the criminal case on slander, based on Mehmet Tatlıcı’s unjust and unlawful criminal complaints that harass Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı…

That being “the situation” Mehmet Tatlıcı finds himself in Turkey, the American Judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G., who handle the case he filed in America, would be able to see all of these facts, if they only “bother” to follow the path that is revealed to them by the law and follow up on the legal process in Turkey as is illustrated in the documents and evidence provided to them (by the lawyers of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı there) and see what Mehmet Tatlıcı has been up to so far; yet these judges, Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. (as we have provided relevant examples above) somehow choose to ignore the legal evidence they are given, as well as Mehmet Tatlıcı’s pursuit of lawlessness, instead of practicing law as it is; hence, they unfortunately keep “playing into the hands of” Mehmet Tatlıcı and become his accomplices with their rulings to these cases of lawlessness…

Everything these American judges, Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. did so far prove this fact:

  • Ignoring Turkish law and the verdicts of Turkish courts,
  • Ignoring international law,
  • Seeing and not wishing to see that Mehmet Tatlıcı never favored an agreement…

Lawlessness 5

Mehmet Tatlıcı has been ignoring the other heirs and moving all by himself since the very beginning of the inheritance cases he initiated against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı in America.

However, as we have mentioned above, there are other heirs in question for the estate of late Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı; Mehmet Tatlıcı’s older brother, Ahmet Tatlıcı, and the children of his late brother Ali Tatlıcı, Salih Ziya Tatlıcı and Bedriye Kamer Tatlıcı…

Considering that late Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı’s estate and all of his assets, which represent the subject of the inheritance cases, are in Turkey and mostly in Istanbul, the mediation or arbitration meetings, if there are to be any, shall be held in Turkey. That is why it would be unlawful to hold such meetings or hearings in another country than Turkey; e.g. United States of America.

Additionally, not all of the heirs of late Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı were called to the mediation hearings in Florida.

The settlement and mediation demand was set forth in the legal process, which is ongoing in the state of Florida of United States of America, with the case Mehmet Tatlıcı filed there, without the inclusion of all of the heirs, whose names we have listed above. It is quite clear that this is unlawful, irrational and illogical, in addition to not being legally applicable.

WHAT IS THIS CALLED IF NOT A “LEGAL FARCE”?

However, despite all the obvious legal facts, there are still two judges in question, Judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G., who allow these events of lawlessness and overlook this legal comedy, written and staged by Mehmet Tatlıcı, “in the name of the law”…

In the name of the law, one must actually inquire it…

There is yet another controversy in this matter with respect to American Law, which points to a grave situation in the name of the law too; we are presenting it to our readers as follows:

Lawlessness 6

Mehmet Tatlıcı is represented as an heir with a “reserved portion” only in the inheritance cases that are ongoing in both Turkey and Florida as per the laws of these two countries. This status is valid for the cases in Turkey and in America.

Moreover, the American law dictates that an heir with only a reserved portion from the inheritance does not even have the right to file such lawsuits in United States of America…

Mehmet Tatlıcı filed this case as if he was the sole heir to the estate of his late father, Mehmet Salih Tatlici…

On the other hand and as we explained above, names of the other heirs with reserved portions from the inheritance cases in Turkey; i.e. Mehmet Tatlıcı’s older brother Ahmet Tatlıcı and the children of his late brother Ali Tatlıcı, Salih Ziya Tatlıcı and Bedriye Kamer Tatlıcı, are not mentioned in the least in the cases Mehmet Tatlıcı filed against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı in America…

Furthermore, these three heirs with reserved portions (Ahmet Tatlıcı, Salih Ziya Tatlıcı and Bedriye Kamer Tatlıcı) were never invited to the mediation meetings in America; because Mehmet Tatlıcı hid the other heirs from American justice in an effort to show American justice that he and Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı were the only heirs…

In short; 

  • According to American laws, an heir with reserved portion does not have the right to unilaterally initiate such a case and it is immensely unlawful to overlook it;
  • In addition, it is yet another lawlessness that the other heirs (Mehmet Tatlıcı’s older brother Ahmet Tatlıcı and the children of his late brother Ali Tatlıcı, Salih Ziya Tatlıcı and Bedriye Kamer Tatlıcı, who were completely ignored at this point) were not called to the mediation meetings for the inheritance of late Mehmet Salih Tatlici, which were initiated by Mehmet Tatlıcı unilaterally, unjustly and unlawfully…

But not to worry; the American judges were able to disregard the concerning law and legislation of their own country in this case, which came before them a decade ago, accepting this case and signing off on a huge legal mistake. Handling the case nowadays, American judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. picked up from where the previous judges left their mistakes and currently take the same lawlessness to whole new levels with the wrong decisions they are making…

In the past decade, Mehmet Tatlıcı, the heir with a “reserved portion”, who also initiated this case:

– Was not able to procure a single evidence for the judges to support his claims;

– Lost all the cases he filed in Turkey in the meantime and never once favored settlement or agreement in the legal process in Turkey; on the contrary, he kept filing criminal complaints that targeted Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı (15 criminal complaints to be exact) with tens of lawsuits against them (all of which were finalized to his detriment and exonerated the defendants);

The judicial procedures dictated by international law are quite clear, as we explained above; still, Mehmet Tatlıcı is staging a new game with the mindset of “what if it works” and his deception of “I want to settle, let us have a mediation meeting and we can come to an agreement with the other party” in America, while judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. unfortunately become the “actors” of this legal comedy too by signing off on various events of lawlessness we exemplified in this article…

Lawlessness 7

Other significant examples of lawlessness in the Florida court’s decisions of mediation also catch attention:

Judges at the Court of Florida, Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. constantly and basically threat Nurten Tatlıcı and Uğur Tatlıcı to be physically present at the mediation meetings in question (over their rulings and as can be found in court records too) by saying “If you do not show up, we will overrule all legal defenses and evidence you presented in this case”; they force Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı to travel across oceans with such a long flight in an unlawful and unjust manner, rejecting the humane or legal excuses declared to them by Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı (the details of which we provide below)…

For example, Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, through their lawyers in Florida, submitted an affidavit to the Florida Court on March 8th, 2017 and February 6th, 2019, where they explained the reasons underlying their absence from the mediation meetings in the state of Florida of the United States of America with evidence/documents in addenda:

Prepared by Nurten Tatlıcı’s counselors in America for the courts there, these documents shed light on the following items one by one:

  • Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı do not live in the United States of America and have not been there for many years; they are not even in possession of entry visas for the country;
  • The relations between America and Turkey are tense at the moment (for these events coincided with the apprehension of American priest Andrew Brunson, on grounds of aiding and abetting terrorist organizations in Turkey) and American consulates in Turkey put a halt in all visa procedures;
  • Furthermore, Uğur Tatlıcı had a broken leg, which was why he was receiving treatment and was bed-bound; later he was barely able to move with crutches and he submitted his official health reports, stating that he cannot go through long flights in his condition to the court in America, where the case in question was being handled (along with his existing doctor’s and hospital records and relevant documents);
  • Especially the age and health status of Nurten Tatlıcı was explained (in detail and with the relevant medical reports in addenda); she had vertigo – a disorder, attacks of which could not be predicted; therefore, such a long travel would carry a fatal risk for her.

Despite Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı’s declarations of justifiable excuses, Judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. did not find any of them enough, even when they stated that they can legally be represented by their lawyers in America at these mediation meetings and can even attend via tele/videoconferencing.

Forcing these people (Nurten Tatlıcı, who cannot handle such long trips due to her health which is supported with medical reports and Uğur Tatlıcı, who was barely able to stand up, for he broke his leg, was walking with crutches and even prescribed bed rest) to take a trip across oceans and attend the mediation meetings in Florida in person is definitely both against the law and human rights.

Now let us explain in further detail why these verdicts of Judge Jamie G. and Judge Jeffrey D.G. are lawless and in violation of human rights:

We have already explained in the subsection Lawlessness 1 that in such inheritance cases, Turkish law must be practiced and maintained as per international legal practices, for both the legator and the heirs are citizens of the Republic of Turkey and all of the owners of the immovables within the estate reside in Turkey.

Furthermore, the title deeds of the real estate properties in question belong to Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı and to them only; none of these properties belong to late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı and they never have been in the past either; and that is the apparent truth…

After these reminders, we would also like to share with our dear readers the legal aspect of the matter of mediation, which was demanded with a brazen face by Mehmet Tatlıcı in Florida, for apparently he “wanted to come to an agreement”, whereas he never favored it in Turkey:

– The equivalent of mediation in Turkish legislation is arbitration. Arbitration in Turkey is regulated in two forms: compulsory arbitration as a cause of action in the legal process and voluntary arbitration:

Voluntary arbitration is completely up to the wishes of both parties.

– Compulsory arbitration, on the other hand, is stipulated for some business cases and commercial litigations.

– Even in compulsory arbitration, the party with the obligation can request arbitration, there is no barrier to do so; however, Turkish law practices dictate that no person from either party can be forced to be present in arbitration meetings.

The case Mehmet Tatlıcı filed in Florida against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, on the other hand, is obviously and legally an inheritance case, rather than a commercial or business-related one;

Mehmet Tatlıcı asks unilaterally for an arbitration meeting, which is not legally binding for the other party (i.e., Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı) and therefore, they cannot legally be forced to be present at the arbitration meeting;

Moreover, Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı are constantly represented by their lawyers in America at these hearings and mediation meetings; besides, they are not able to travel such a long way on legal and justifiable grounds, but they can attend the meetings via methods of teleconference or videoconferences (which are allowed by the American law in such cases).

Yet, Judge Jamie G. and Judge Jeffrey D.G., do not think that Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı’s participation via tele/videoconferencing “suffice” and push them into attending the mediation meetings in person after a flight across oceans, despite the fact that they have legal and justifiable reasons for their absence.

And despite their lack of legal rights to do so…

There is yet another fact, which was rejected by the very same judges; i.e. Judge Jamie G. and Judge Jeffrey D.G.:

During this process, the judges in America were even proposed that instead of all the parties that reside in Turkey, flying from Turkey to America, the mediator can be brought to Turkey with all expenses paid by Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı (including the mediator’s travel, accommodation and personal expenses) and the mediation meeting can be held before the mediator, but only in Turkey.

However, American Judge Jamie G., with an incomprehensible attitude, did not entertain this idea and basically threatened Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, who were not able to fly to America for health-related reasons, and implied that he would finalize the whole case to their detriment:

“Unless you are physically present, I will ignore all the steps you are to take to defend yourselves within this case Mehmet Tatlıcı filed against you, as well as your claims and evidence.”

Those were his words and he forced these people to go to America every time…

Therefore, it is in fact a legal comedy with Judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. overlooking the conduct of this comedy until today, even when Mehmet Tatlıcı can submit no evidence or documents to prove his claims he posited as he filed the lawsuit in Florida with unjust and unlawful grounds (within a decade that has passed since); similarly, the same judges left aside the law they have to practice and judicial procedures and started interpreting and executing the trials “as they felt like it”, when the same Mehmet Tatlıcı came forth this time and said, “I want to come to an agreement and thus, demand mediation.”

On the other hand and as we explained above in detail,

  • Turkish Law must be practiced in this case and in Turkish Law, there is no compulsory mediation;
  • It must be considered that voluntary mediation activities can be finalized without any sanctions, if any party wishes to withdraw from it;
  • The parties in question cannot be forced to attend the mediation hearings in Florida (and they cannot face sanctions if they are not present), which is a legal fact…

However, the judges of this case, Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G., do not consider these legal and humane facts and keep pushing Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı to attend these mediation meetings in person.

That is because,

– They ignore the fact that the inheritance case, which is the subject of the case before them, as well as the actual cause of the conflict among the heirs, is being handled in Turkey;

– They insist on rejecting, unlawfully and unjustly, the laws such as the ACT ON INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE AND CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW and Hague Convention of 1 August 1989 on the Law Applicable to Succession to the Estates of Deceased Persons and international conventions, which are signed by America and Turkey, and must be practiced in the relevant legal processes, laws and procedures;

– They accept none of the objections of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, relayed to them via their lawyers in Florida and keep warning them.

These judges, Judge Jamie G. and Judge Jeffrey D.G. go so far as to dare reveal an attitude that is far from law and justice to say “Unless you are physically present, I will ignore all the steps you are to take to defend yourselves within this case Mehmet Tatlıcı filed against you, as well as your claims and evidence.” This statement, uttered to the lawyers of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, can be found in the official court records there as well. On top of it all, they claim that they are doing this in the name of “law”…

We are leaving it at the discretion of our readers to determine the kind of lawlessness in question here, as well as the Turkish and American public…

Lawlessness 8:

There is a verdict of the 11th Family Court of Istanbul in Turkey, ruled against Mehmet Tatlıcı on January 15th, 2019:

Accordingly, the courts forbid Mehmet Tatlıcı to be in closer proximity than 50 meters to the persons of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı and their residences and workplaces.

This means that it is legally forbidden for Mehmet Tatlıcı to get together with Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı and sit at the same table; thus, it would be illegal for Mehmet Tatlıcı to request mediation and force Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı to be in the same room with him. There is a very clear and definite restriction, ruled by the courts against Mehmet Tatlıcı in Turkey. Moreover, this verdict was extended twice by the same court in the following months and still stands.

This verdict was ruled, because a photograph of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı (taken on the day of the funeral without them noticing, as they were tearful and in grief) was found stabbed on the tomb of late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı (husband of Nurten Tatlıcı and father of Uğur Tatlıcı) with a mafiatic threat note on it with the words:

“you will be crying for so long!!” and “this inheritance will not belong to anyone!!!”

Explicitly threatening Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı with death, this “mafiatic” message led to the warning towards Mehmet Tatlıcı with a court ruling, stating that he cannot be in closer proximity of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı than 50 meters, for his past behaviors such as filing tens of lawsuits against them over the years, constantly filing complaints to offices of prosecution about them with unjust and unlawful claims, harassing them with criminal complaints and even the criminal suit in his past with the request of 16 years of imprisonment on grounds of slander, represent evidence. The court ruling in question was repeated in the following months and still is in standing.

That being the case, it appears to be impossible for Mehmet Tatlıcı to suddenly surface in Florida and say with a brazen face that “he wants to come to an agreement”, unilaterally calling Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı to a mediation meeting in all sincerity (sincerus-pure/honest), in addition to the impossibility of their gathering in the same room (for there is a court ruling that forbids this situation).

Nevertheless, the “judges”, who handle the case in Florida – Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G.disregard even this ruling of the court in Turkey, decline all official documents Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı submit to the court through their lawyers in America about this legal status, such as affidavits and notarized translations. In short, they absolutely do not accept any of these legal evidence and documents (including court verdicts) and force Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, unlawfully and inhumanely, to come to the mediation meeting in person…

Mehmet Tatlıcı has been targeting Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı with different ways of harassment for over a decade, so it is only normal that they are concerned to come together. On the other hand, as we have mentioned above, they received mafiatic threats and were even assigned state custody by the 11th Family Court of Istanbul; in other words, they have all the right reasons to be worried about their rights to live and safety. From humanitarian and legal perspectives, in this sense, Judge Jamie G. and Judge Jeffrey D.G., the judges handling the case in Florida, are completely unfair for forcing Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı to take a trip across the ocean and fly to the United States of America for the mediation meeting…

Consequently, it is inhumane and unlawful for Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı to be forced to attend the mediation meetings in Florida, despite their justifiable excuses.

Similarly, Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı are also right in their legal and humane excuses for not wanting to get together with the other heir, Mehmet Tatlıcı, due to the aforementioned reasons.

In short, we guess one simply has to miss the meaning of law and human rights or needs to be more like the judges “Jamie G.” and “Jeffrey D.G.”, who signed off on all these events of lawlessness, to fail to understand the reasons as to why Nurten Tatlıcı and Uğur Tatlıcı were subjected to sanctions by the Florida Court, for they were to be absent from the mediation meetings, despite having legally justifiable excuses.

That is because ignoring all these rightful reasons and legal evidence and constantly forcing Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı to attend these mediation meetings in Florida, would be, simply put, cruel, unjust and unfair. On the other hand, the persons, who are responsible from it, Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. keep showing up at the courthouses in Florida with the title of “judge” they put before their names, signing off on all types of lawlessness.

We are leaving it at the discretion of our readers, as well as Turkish and American publics, to comment on how accurate would it be to expect a just and lawful ruling from a so-called judge as Jeffrey D.G., who jailed a mother indefinitely, for she did not want to have her son circumcised – a real life example as we covered above – and threatened to keep her there, unless she consented to the circumcision of her son.

Otherwise, how can a person, who thinks he deserves a judicial office can say the following words for them to be recorded in official court records, despite all the legal documents to illustrate the justifications and legal proof, submitted to him:

“Unless you show up in person in this case Mehmet Tatlıcı filed against you, I will ignore all the steps you are to take to defend yourselves and will not take into consideration your claims and evidence…”

WHAT KIND OF A JUDICIAL AUTHORITY IS THIS? WHERE IS THE LAW? WHERE IS JUSTICE?

These people, who dare to call themselves judges; i.e. American judges Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. put in appearances in the case Mehmet Tatlıcı filed, unlawfully and unjustly making such decisions against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, favoring Mehmet Tatlıcı and shamelessly utter the aforementioned words (which can also be found in court records)…

On behalf of so-called law in the United States of America, such a “legal comedy”, written by Mehmet Tatlıcı, is staged; while the “two actors” – Jamie G. and Jeffrey D.G. play “the judges” in this comedy…

These are the facts as can be found in official case files in both Turkey and United States of America, while this legal comedy has been and still is on the stage as it is for the past decade…

IS THERE NOT A SINGLE JUDGE IN AMERICA TO CONSIDER THE CASE THERE FROM AN ACTUALLY LEGAL PERSPECTIVE?

Of course there is; his name is Charles B.

Charles B. was the presiding judge at the “pretrial conference” we mentioned above. The investigations of our news crew revealed the actual purposes of the actors of this legal comedy at this hearing; but also, the legal evaluations of Judge Charles B. at this point indicate significant findings in terms of illustrating the lawlessness of Judge Jamie G. in the overall legal process Mehmet Tatlıcı initiated in Florida against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı…

The events of the pretrial conference with the presiding judge, Judge Charles B.:

During the hearing, Judge Charles B. said to Mehmet Tatlıcı and his attorney Jeremy Friedman:

“This case has not been going anywhere for a decade, everything is at a standstill” and asked:

“You filed this case against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı and are the party that initiated this legal process; why are you demanding mediation with these people now, after having failed to come to an agreement for all these years; why don’t you want to see the process be handled in the actual trial before a jury or see it finalized quickly?”

Jeremy Friedman, Mehmet Tatlıcı’s attorney, vaguely said the following, instead of answering the actual questions:

We would like to come to an agreement and we expect the other party to agree with us too (!)” and he added:

  • “My client, Mehmet Tatlıcı, came here from Istanbul three times for mediation hearings, but Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı failed to abide by the rulings of Judge Jamie G., who handles the trial; Judge Jamie G. said that unless they are present at these hearings, the evidence and documents they are to submit to the court would not be accepted by him and they would be deprived of all of their rights of defense and requested this pretrial conference, where you are the acting judge”; 
  • “Now we expect you to rule the same; Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı did not show up at the hearing, as you can see; we expect you to ignore all of the documents and evidence for their defense, as Judge Jamie G., and finalize this case to their detriment…”

The aforementioned answers reveal that their true intention was to “corner” Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı to suit Mehmet Tatlıcı’s wishes with such unlawful and unjust rulings from the judges (as are revealed by the facts we will cover below), rather than actually coming to an agreement…

That is apparent, for Mehmet Tatlıcı never chose to come to an agreement with Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, whom he sued in America, which can clearly be observed from the details we provided above (as well as the official records of the courts of law and prosecution, besides the news in media); on the contrary, he filed tens of lawsuits and a total of 15 criminal complaints against them in Turkey with unjust, unlawful and ungrounded claims…

At the same time, there was a decision about Mehmet Tatlıcı, ruled by the 11th Family Court of Istanbul, stating that he cannot be in closer proximity than 50 meters of Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, their residences and workplaces. The underlying reason of this ruling was the “mafiatic” death threats, targeting Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı. As a result, the 11th Family Court of Istanbul ruled this warning against Mehmet Tatlıcı (and Murat Yüce, whose name was also mixed up with him in the cases and criminal complaints Mehmet Tatlıcı filed against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı) and renewed it in the following months.

“IF YOU WISH TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT, COME TO AN AGREEMENT…”

The judge at the hearing, Charles B., asks Mehmet Tatlıcı’s counselor Jeremy Friedman once again:

“So if you are intent on coming to an agreement, why do you insist at this hearing and ask me to rule a verdict against the party you sued, overlooking all the defenses and evidence they set forth throughout the legal process? If you want to come to an agreement, come to an agreement already…”

And he continues:

“Besides, the other party is not physically present at this preliminary hearing and they are represented by their counselors only; I cannot rule a verdict to strip them of their rights of defense just because of this reason; despite having the authority to do so due to the nature of my position, I see no situation that requires such a verdict. Similarly, they attended the previous mediation meetings through teleconferences, they were not present there either and I do not see it legally fit to strip them of their rights of defense, merely because their counselors represented them when needed. After all, this is only a mediation meeting and such a verdict is not right…”

“Moreover, I am aware that the other judge, Judge Jamie G., insists on requesting Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı to come here and is about to rule a verdict that would deprive them of their rights of defense unless they fail to be present; however, that is his ruling, do not expect me to rule the same verdict…”

“Additionally, I would like to point out something else, based on my experiences; let us assume that Judge Jamie G. and I ruled such a verdict; the other party would immediately seek appeal and the process would hence be extended for another 8-10 years. And this verdict that is to their detriment would most likely come back from the court of appeal to our detriment…”

And he was asking:

“Do you understand me now? And do you insist on the mediation decision, which is very clearly not going to be finalized, instead of continuing with the actual lawsuit you filed for?”

“YOU WILL PASS AWAY FROM THIS WORLD WITHOUT GETTING A CENT FROM THIS INHERITANCE…”

Once Mehmet Tatlıcı’s attorney said “yes, we insist”, Judge Charles B., this time very directly, asked an interesting question to Mehmet Tatlıcı:

“How old are you sir?”

Mehmet Tatlıcı: “53” (on the date of the hearing, which was February 8th, 2018).

The Judge, Charles B., asks the age of Uğur Tatlıcı’s counselor there this time…

The counselor says: “About 40 years old.”

Upon these answers, Judge Charles B. jokingly commented as follows:

“Gentlemen, forgive me for what I am about to say but I am afraid you are going to pass away from this world without getting a cent from this inheritance (cent: 1/100th of a dollar), which is worth, according to your declarations, 3.5 billion dollars (implying that the case would probably go on for years without being finalized); now say yes and move on to the lawsuit, instead of mediation; the court would decide one thing or the other and this case would be finalized in a relatively shorter time, when all of you are still alive; you can receive your shares from the estate and seize the chance to enjoy this money during your mortal days…”

 The words of American Judge Charles B. that can be found in the case file there (just like we have been suggesting for years as Tatlıcı Truths news crew and editors) also show that the inheritance late businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı, who was a respectable and charitable person, left behind after working very hard for years and accumulating what he made, just cannot be shared by his children in agreement (with Mehmet Tatlıcı in the lead); instead, they continue with these moves that would be on one’s conscience as we have been covering on Tatlıcı Truths news site for years. It is sad to watch and is hard to interpret with a sound mind and conscience…

But still, a great legal comedy is staged in America in the case Mehmet Tatlıcı filed against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı, for not only the international law, but also the binding rulings of American and Turkish Law are overlooked herein; the lead actors of this comedy, in line with the evidence procured by our news crew, appear to be two judges: Judge Jamie G. and Judge Jeffrey D.G.

We will keep sharing further developments with our readers and the public…

Gerçekler

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

scroll to top